Will a Fly Survive a Car Accident?

AI Thread Summary
A fly inside a car that crashes into a wall is likely to survive due to its small mass and the reduction of momentum before impact. The discussion highlights that factors such as the car's speed, the fly's position, and the point of impact are crucial in determining the outcome. While the consensus leans toward the fly surviving, the uncertainty surrounding various variables complicates the assessment. Ultimately, the fly's survival is not guaranteed, but its chances appear favorable under typical conditions. The conversation underscores the complexity of predicting outcomes in such scenarios.
[initial steve]
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Would a fly traveling in a car that hits a brick wall be killed?

Windows closed, fly around the middle of the car.. aircon off :P

Im thinking that the fly would lose enough momentum before it hits the front window or dashboard to survive..

:D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i dunno, i mean flys are pretty pudgy (dense)
if it was a butterfly maybe
 
They generally do not like to die :(

I doubt they would die...

EDIT: It depends on the speed of the car and the mass of the bug I suppose.
 
well, i think it depends on which part of the body hits the wall first and the speed of the car before collision because mometum is the product of speed and mass of the object and i don't think flying in a car will reduce much velocity by the friction of air and body.
 
There are way to many unknowns to even consider the question.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top