Will a Master's Degree from UMKC Enhance My Future Academic Opportunities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adam2eden
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A senior physics major in China is considering pursuing a master's degree at UMKC but is uncertain about its value for future opportunities. The discussion highlights that while the program's quality is important, the relevance of the courses and research opportunities should also be considered. Waiting a year for potentially better offers is discouraged, as many programs have winter admissions and late applications may be accepted. The importance of university rankings in the job market is emphasized, particularly for careers in academia. Ultimately, pursuing the master's degree could provide clarity on whether to continue in physics or shift to engineering.
adam2eden
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am a senior physics major in China. Now there is a chance in UMKC, which is a regular state university, to get a master degree in physics. I am not sure whether I want to make a career out of physics. So I hope I can have more options after I finish it if I decide to go. Is there a possiblity that this master degree will help me get a chance to study in a better school, whatever physics or engineering? If this is ture, then how better? I think this is a litter hard to answer, but is there an average situation or someone who have similar experiences? If I don't go, I have to wait here for a year for I have missed the time to application, but in that way I think I can get much better offers. So do you think I should go? Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your question: you're wondering if it's worth it to pursue a master's degree at an institution that is perhaps not your first choice, or if you should wait a year and hope to get into a "better" school.

I don't know anything about the program at UMKC, or even what those initials stand for for that matter, so I can't comment on the program itself. As long as the courses cover the material you want to study and the opportunities for research are acceptable to you, I don't see how going to a "better" school would make that much of a difference (and if they're not, then there's no point in entering the program).

Either way, I wouldn't wait a year. Most programs that I'm familiar with admit new students in the winter semmester. You can also contact the graduate coordinator of the program you're interested in and see if there's any way you can submit a late application. On occasion, they make acceptions.

Also, pursuing a master's degree is, in my opinion, an excellent way of figuring out whether or not you want to make a career out of physics.
 
Thank you for your advice.

Mostly we chinese use the university ranking by major to help us make decision for lack of knowledge. It has some sense I think. And to make a career out of physics in my oppinion often means never get out of school, like become a professor at school, and to achieve that you have to graduate from a university of at least top 20 in the US and here we have similar situations. So a better univerisity of high ranking means a lot when you consider your value in the job market.

UMKC(university of Missouri at Kansas City) is not such a university(ranked 100 or after in physics), but it waivers the GRE test, which I have not taken until now. So I don't have too much choise if I want to go this year. And to go means after my first masters' degree I have to pursue a ph.D in physics or another master's degree in engineering, and in a better university. So it will help a lot if I know whether the first degree helps a lot on this point or not.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top