Will a matter get 0 volume on -273 C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Govind_Balaji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of Bose-Einstein Condensates (BEC) and the implications of cooling substances to absolute zero. It clarifies that while cooling a substance to near 0K can lead to the formation of a BEC, reaching absolute zero (0K) is theoretically impossible, and thus a substance cannot attain zero volume. The conversation raises questions about the conservation of mass, particularly regarding the disappearance of atoms during experiments with BECs. It is noted that the mass is conserved, as the atoms likely formed undetected molecules rather than being destroyed. The discussion also emphasizes that the formation of a BEC is not a straightforward process and typically occurs only under specific conditions, primarily with dilute gases. Additionally, the idea of matter achieving infinitely small volume is debated, with the consensus that such a scenario does not align with current physical theories.
Govind_Balaji
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Today in my chemistry class, the teacher said:

When a substance is cooled closer to 0K, it will for Bose-Einstein Condensate, but if we cool it further to absolute zero, the substance will attain zero volume.

Is it true? If yes I have a doubt. 0 vloume means the matter will demolish right? Then how will the mass of the demolished matter be conserved according to Law of conservation of mass?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This is not true.
Also note that a full Bose-Einstein condensate is the lowest-energy state (for bosons), it is at 0 K and you cannot make it cooler.
 
Do you mean the lowest possible temperature a matter can be cooled is 0 k?
 
That's the definition of 0 K, yes.There is a good reason to assign negative temperature values to some systems, but those are hotter than any system with zero or positive temperature.
 
There are some very interesting properties of a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC)...

When the JILA team raised the magnetic field strength still further, the condensate suddenly reverted to attraction, imploded and shrank beyond detection, and then exploded, expelling off about two-thirds of its 10,000 or so atoms. About half of the atoms in the condensate seemed to have disappeared from the experiment altogether, not being seen either in the cold remnant or the expanding gas cloud.

Carl Wieman explained that under current atomic theory this characteristic of Bose–Einstein condensate could not be explained because the energy state of an atom near absolute zero should not be enough to cause an implosion...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose–Einstein_condensate
 
Govind_Balaji said:
That's what I asked. What happened to those protons and electorns of the disappeared atoms.

Were they conserved?

Yes, they were just not detected. If you had read the Wikipedia entry, you would have seen after twhat OCR quoted:
Most likely they formed molecules consisting of two bonded rubidium atoms.

Also, the statement
When a substance is cooled closer to 0K, it will for Bose-Einstein Condensate
is mostly false. When a substance is cooled [Edit: to a low enough temperature], it forms a solid [Edit: with the exception of helium, which becomes superfluid]. Only in very special cases, such as for dilute gases, does a bunch of bosons can be coerced to form a BEC. It is not trivial to do!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thank you DrClaude
 
Could a real rate of matter volume become infinitely small? If you are convinced it cannot be done in the universe, then the absolute zero cannot be achieved in the universe.

Also a demolition of the matter in 0 volume, as a real phenomenon, makes no sense to consider.
 
Back
Top