Will a slight change in angle significantly affect distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr.Whatever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Change
Mr.Whatever
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I was wondering about this topic. The following assumptions are made:

- area is flat and about 70 miles wide from all direction
- ideal airplane only changes in height (roll, azimuth, pitch stay constant).

So here's the scenario:

If a laser beam is mounted on an airplane and is pointed in a 45 degree angle towards the ground (with the right wing of the plane from a cockpit perspective as zero degrees and the angles ascend in a clockwise manner), then would a slight change in the airplane's height significantly alter the location of the beam on the ground?

I was just curious about this topic, and on paper, I'm actually using elevation angle instead of height. The elevation angle is defined as the angle formed between: 1) a line from the plane to the ground directly underneath it and 2) a line from the plane to the point on the ground where the beam is pointing.

I want to know how to calculate the change of the beam's position when this elevationg angle varies by +/- 1 degree.

I know that the elevation angle is dependent on the airplane's height, and that if the airplane was close to the ground then a +/-1 degree change would not really amount to a significant change in position of the beam. But if the plane was, say, 1000 ft in the ground, then this would be a different story.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm a little confused about your definition for elevation angle: from what you've described, it seems that the laser is always pointed at 45^\circ towards the ground, and so the elevation angle should always be 45^\circ (that would be the angle between a normal to the ground and the laser beam, assuming the ground's flat). I'm sure I've misinterpreted your problem.

However, using the interpretation that stated above, it's easy to see what happens if the airplane rises or lowers. In this case all the angles stay the same; there is a right triangle with 45^\circ corner angles and vertices at (a) the point on the ground directly below the laser, (b) the point at which the laser strikes the ground, and (c) the laser.

In that case increasing altitude corresponds to increasing the distance from (a) to (c); furthermore, because of the 45 degree angles the height of the plane (ie. the distance (a) to (c)) is the same as the distance between (b) and (a).

By similar triangles, scaling the height by a factor \Delta will scale all other distances in the same way. So if you increase the height of the plane by 1%, then the distance between the point directly below the plane on the ground and the point where the laser strikes the ground will also increase by 1% (ie. between (b) and (a)). Because the angles are 45^\circ, in fact increasing the height by a h will also increase the distance on the ground by h (ie. you don't need to worry about any scaling; the increases in altitude is exactly the increase in distance along the ground).
 
Last edited:
^^ +1 , yes it will and it will change more significantly as you become farther (higher) from the ground. think about it like compound interest * but only if your angles greater than 45 degrees




* these statements have not been evaluated.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top