Will Friction Loss Stop Water From Flowing?

AI Thread Summary
Friction loss in a fire hose or pipe can reduce water pressure, but it is debated whether it can completely stop water flow if there is a continuous supply from a city main. Some argue that as long as there is at least 0.434 psi, water will continue to flow, regardless of hose length. Others contend that friction loss will eventually reduce pressure to zero GPM. The flow rate decreases with distance, but some flow is expected even at long lengths. Ultimately, while friction loss affects flow, it may not completely halt it under continuous supply conditions.
castfire
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you have a continuous supply of water from a city main averaging 80 psi flow, will friction loss in a fire hose or pipe ever prevent water from flowing out of an opening downstream, assuming there is no elevation gain to overcome?

Some friction loss calculations state that EVENTUALLY the friction loss will reduce the pressure so much that the water will stop flowing.

Other theories suggest that as long as there is an unlimited and continuous supply of water being pumped into the pipe or hose, and as long as there is atleast .434 psi pushing the water, then the container (hose) will continue to fill until it is full and push the water from the exit point. Even if the pipe is infinity long.

Thanks in advance for solving a 40 year fire station kitchen table debate!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the water were stationary, there'd be no frictional force to overcome. Water is not subject to static friction. Moreover, the source pressure would be transferred all the way to the nozzle without loss. So some flow would occur. In practice, over a sufficiently long pipe, there would always be other issues, such as slight gradients, spin of the earth...
The .434 psi represents one vertical foot of water. So that's the pressure you would need to overcome a one foot rise from source to nozzle.
 
Friction loss is realized when water is pumped through a fire hose or pipe (ie 10 psi per 100 of 2 1/2" hose flowing 200 gpm). Some argue that the friction would eventually be too great to overcome and you would get 0 GPM. I say that some flow would occur at the end of a hose as long as you continuously pumped water into it. However, your GPM and PSI would be much less at 2000' than at 100'.
 
castfire said:
Some friction loss calculations state that EVENTUALLY the friction loss will reduce the pressure so much that the water will stop flowing.

Some theories of aerodynamics state that bumblebees can't fly, but the bees never got smart enough to find that out.

Any mathematical model (formula) about friction loss only applies over some range of conditions. If you want a model that predicts how high pressure fire hoses and pumps will behave when they are being used the way they are meant to be used, you don't really care if it is "wrong" in other situations. On the other hand, a formula that works fine modelling the low speed, low pressure flow in a city's water supply network would probably give nonsense answers for a fire hose.

It doesn't make much physical sense to say the flow would ever stop completely. If you take a hosepipe, block one end, and fill it with water, when you unblock the ends water will start to flow out of which ever end is lowest, without any pump. If the pipe is very long the flow will start slowly (because there's a lot of water in the pipe that has to be moved by a small pressure difference) but the flow will start. While the flow velocity is small, the only "resistance" to the flow is the inertia of the mass of water in the pipe, not friction losses.
 
castfire said:
Friction loss is realized when water is pumped through a fire hose or pipe (ie 10 psi per 100 of 2 1/2" hose flowing 200 gpm). Some argue that the friction would eventually be too great to overcome and you would get 0 GPM.
As I said, the loss depends on speed. The lower the speed, the lower the drag, and as the speed tends to zero so does the drag. The drag at 200gpm doesn't tell you what will happen at 0.01 gpm.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top