Will Latex make a comeback someday?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nahya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations of electric fields generated by point charges Qa and Qb, using the formula for electric field strength. The net electric field is derived from the contributions of both charges, taking into account their distances and magnitudes. The user expresses frustration with LaTeX not functioning properly, which affects the presentation of their calculations. Despite this, they provide a detailed breakdown of the steps involved in solving the problem, emphasizing the importance of vector calculus. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted remark about the potential for LaTeX to make a comeback in the future.
nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
never mind. sorry :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where my calculator is, so this might be wrong... but the theory should be there.

Qa
Qb
are point charges.

Thus:
\vec E = \frac{kq}{r^2}\hat r

\vec r_{PQa} = \left[\begin{array}{c} 11 \cross 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

\vec r_{PQb} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} (11+22) \times 10^2 m \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

r_{PQa} = |vec r_{PQa}| = \sqrt{(11\times 10^2 m)^2+(0)^2+(0)^2}=11\times 10^2m

r_{PQb}=33\times 10^2 m

\vec E_{net} = \vec E_{Qa} + \vec E_{Qb} = \frac{kQa}{r_{pQa}^2}\hat r_{Qa} + \frac{kQb}{r_{{pQb}^2}\hat r_{Qb}

Notice that:
\hat r_{Qa}=\hat r_{Qb} = \hat i = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right]

Thus:
\vec E_{net} = k\hat i \left(\frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)

After you plug in k and cross of the units you get:
\vec E = \hat i \left((9\times 10^9) \frac{4\times 10^{-6}}{(11 \times 10^2 m)^2} + \frac{-1 \times 10^{-6}}{33 \times 10^2 m}\right)\fraq{N}{C}

Also remember that you can drop the vector notation for \vec E_{net} [/tex] by taking the magnitude of it. And since you only have one component E_{net} is just equal to whatever that calculation is above. Sorry, I really don't feel like doing that by hand... not that it's hard. I'm just too lazy to do it.<br /> <br /> For the second part of your question recall that: <br /> \vec F_{12} = \frac{kq_1 q_2}{r^2}\hat r<br /> <br /> I think you can figure it out from what I showed you above. I gave a very rigrious calculation, not skipping many steps. I find it easier just to think about most questions like this as three dimensional questions, and just do a little bit more steps with the vector calculus.
 
well.. the latex thing isn't working atm, i guess. ^^
i solved the problem, however. i just didn't think about the types of the resulting charges.
 
Why are you taking the absolute value? How are you setting up the problem for the force?
 
Cool. Well I guess you're good.

Maybe some day Latex will come back :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
659
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
829
Replies
8
Views
570
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top