Will my special siphon work please?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a proposed siphon design involving a compressed air chamber intended to create an unbalanced system that forces water up a tube. Participants express skepticism about the design's viability, questioning whether it attempts to achieve perpetual motion. Concerns are raised about the pressure differences between the tanks, suggesting that water would flow from left to right rather than just up the tube. Ultimately, the original poster concedes that the design may not work as intended and decides to lock the thread due to a lack of definitive answers. The conversation highlights the challenges of creating effective siphon systems and the importance of understanding fluid dynamics.
Flantoons
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Please look at this drawing of my idea, and tell me if you think it would work.
The compressed air chamber on the left keeps this system un-balanced, and water is continually forced up the tube, and into the right hand chamber.

pressure%20siphon.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, it will be forced up the tube -- but also since the pressure on the bottom of the tank on the left is higher than on the bottom of the tank on the right, it will also flow from left to right, filling up the tank on the right directly. So what's the point here: is this an attempt at a perpetual motion machine? FYI, we don't allow that here...
 
I think that at equilibrium the level in the tube should be the same as the level in the right tank.
Any reason for it to go higher?
 
OK, I see what you mean...I cave.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Since it looks like we'really done and I didn't get an answer to my question (so I assume the answer is yes), thread locked.
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Help understanding how my "magic" siphon works....
Replies
17
Views
4K
Microfluidics in pressures lower than one atmosphere
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Steam flow rate in 2-chamber steam engine system
Replies
4
Views
2K
I A specific case of an exception to Archimedes' Principle?
Replies
40
Views
4K
Picking up on the discussion "Air build-up in a siphon system"
Replies
6
Views
3K
On-demand steam engine idea
Replies
14
Views
2K
How does a Western free reed work? (musical instruments)
Replies
12
Views
4K
I Water bath and water vapor + air mixture in a closed system
Replies
2
Views
1K
How Can I Create Water Pressure in a Vessel Without a Standard Pump?
Replies
8
Views
2K
How pressure affects partial pressures (and dewpoint)
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top