Will the pressures even out because the elasticity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jordy Wells
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity even
AI Thread Summary
When four rocket balloons of varying diameters are placed on a soft base and a rigid platform, the initial pressure distribution is influenced by the balloons' elasticity and shape. Larger balloons, despite being under higher tension, tend to ovalize more under load, increasing their contact area with the base. This ovalization results in a more even distribution of force across the soft base, leading to similar final forces exerted by each balloon. Consequently, the internal air pressure in the larger balloons is lower than in the smaller ones due to their larger contact area causing reduced bearing stress. Overall, the final pressure on the soft base remains approximately equal for each balloon, assuming uniform weight distribution on the platform.
Jordy Wells
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If I have a soft base (mud or sand) and place 4 rocket balloons (long narrow ones used for twisting into shapes, animals, etc.) all inflated to the same pressure, but each balloon of a different diameter (1", 2", 3" and 4") and place platform (a thin, but rigid sheet of plastic) on top of the balloons the platform will be at an angle; but if I then place a weight (10 pounds) on top of the platform it will level out. What I want to know: is there a different load value on the soft base beneath each of the balloons? Let's say: 20 psi, 40 psi, etc. or will the pressures even out because the elasticity of the balloon or its conformity to the shape of the soft base spread the load in some other way?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For the same initial internal air pressure and wall thickness, larger cylinders are under higher tension but have a higher thinness ratio. The higher thinness ratio is probably the dominant effect here. Cylinders having a higher thinness ratio (with the same initial internal air pressure) ovalize more easily under an external applied load. The initial external applied force is approximately the same on each of your cylinders [1]. The larger cylinders ovalize more, until their stiffness approximately equals the stiffness of the smaller balloons. This greater ovalization creates a larger surface contact area. The final external load resisted by each balloon is roughly the same for each balloon [1], unless the ovalized balloons are no longer widely spaced. Hence, the final force on the soft base is roughly the same for each balloon. The same force applied to a larger contact area (underneath the larger balloons) causes a lower bearing stress (pressure) on the soft base. A lower bearing pressure on the soft base implies that the final air pressure inside the larger balloons is lower than in the smaller balloons. A lower bearing pressure on the soft base underneath the larger balloons might also cause less imprintment into the soft base.

Therefore, I currently think the final force on the soft base is roughly the same for each balloon [1], in which case the final air pressure inside each balloon would be inversely linearly proportional to the final contact area of each balloon on the soft base.

[1] Note that my above answer assumes that either the weight on the rigid plastic sheet is uniformly distributed (not a concentrated weight), or the rigid plastic sheet is a theoretical rigid-body plate. If this is not the case, the answer might depend on the dimensions and all material properties, which you might want to post, if you wish.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top