Wind turbine with increased efficiency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around improving the efficiency of wind turbines, particularly through innovative designs and energy storage methods. Participants explore concepts related to mechanical systems that could enhance performance at low wind speeds, the feasibility of generating a constant flow of air for turbines, and the challenges of energy storage in urban environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using a mechanical system to store torque from low wind speeds to help turbines overcome initial friction when starting.
  • Others discuss the potential for storing excess wind energy through methods such as hydrogen conversion or battery integration, while noting the practical limitations of current efficiency levels.
  • There is a suggestion that a constant flow of air could be generated to improve turbine performance, particularly in urban settings.
  • Concerns are raised about the finite lifespan and costs associated with batteries for energy storage, suggesting that efficiency might be better achieved by optimizing energy consumption based on wind availability.
  • Some participants argue against placing turbines in cities, advocating instead for offshore installations or utilizing solar energy on rooftops.
  • There are discussions about the impact of urban turbulence on wind energy collection and the potential for designing structures that could better harness wind in such environments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the best approaches to improving wind turbine efficiency, with no consensus reached. There are competing ideas regarding the feasibility of urban wind energy solutions versus traditional turbine placements.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about wind energy efficiency, mechanical designs, and energy storage methods, but these remain unresolved and depend on further technical feasibility studies and empirical data.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers, researchers, and innovators in renewable energy, particularly those focused on wind energy technologies and urban energy solutions.

Recycler
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
Wind turbines apparently now produce electricity only at some minimum wind speed.In my conception,the wind pressure of a lower wind speed is used to exert a force on a diaphragm or vane which stores torque in a spring or other mechanism,This torque could be used to help overcome the initial friction when the blade begins to move again in a sufficient incident wind velocity,Could this improve efficiency marginally?The torque coupling could disengage with a preset rotational speed.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You mean storing excess wind energy? yes definitely. The maximum theoretical efficiency C=60% but in reality wind turbines operate at 10-30% efficiency. The wind energy can be stored by other ways which includes e.g. hydrogen conversion. But i suppose your right about that; others means to increase efficiency would be diameter of these systems, air density or to avoid excessive heat dissipation with the idea you recommended
 
"Stores torque?" Friction is friction.
 
Torsional spring perhaps? And yeah its friction but your providing an additional push or kinetic energy when we know some is dissipated as heat/friction
 
On days when the wind is low it can fluctuate a lot. What they do at present is use an anemometer to detect when the wind speed has risen far enough to make it worth running the turbine. Then they use the generator as a motor to accelerate the rotor up to speed. In short they store the energy in the grid in the form of unburnt coal or oil then borrow it back when needed to spin up the rotor.
 
I am wondering , if a system which will generate a constant flow of air could be utilized with a wind turbine to produce electricity?
I have done some preliminary design work on such a system and would like some feedback about its possible utility and / or desirability.
It could be used in a more urban area than those which are currently in use.

[Mod Note: personal contact details not permitted in forum posts]
 
Can you tell us more? Presumably the "flow of air" is the by product of something as it wouldn't make much sense to create a flow of air specifically to power a wind turbine?
 
Actually, creating the "flow of air" to power a turbine is the purpose of the system which I have designed. After some thought, I find the system could be incorporated into other design elements for various reasons. All-n-all it is quite simple, even natural, in plan and design.
As I have little knowledge of how to protect the value of any intellectual property involved, I really can't say much more.
I had thought of building a "proof of concept" structure but the lack of funds precludes this. I had even thought of a possible "crowd funding" project, but there again my lack of knowledge of such things has held me back. I first need to learn of its overall need and desirability before proceeding further.
 
Usually in this situation a preliminary technical feasibility study is conducted prior to building a working model. Then overall need and desirability (economic feasibility) is investigated later after you've demonstrated that what you want to do can actually be done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Rauji
  • #10
I would first investigate if the blade speed change delay was a significant problem. Then I would determine where the various response lags occurred, if correction was necessary.

It might be easiest to start by seeing if a real problem exists.
 
  • #11
Aleena786 said:
You mean storing excess wind energy? yes definitely. The maximum theoretical efficiency C=60% but in reality wind turbines operate at 10-30% efficiency. The wind energy can be stored by other ways which includes e.g. hydrogen conversion. But i suppose your right about that; others means to increase efficiency would be diameter of these systems, air density or to avoid excessive heat dissipation with the idea you recommended
Hello, I recently read that Japanese scientist are researching ways to store wind energy. Building these turbines with battery's used for storing wind energy included in the design. Making these turbines bigger, propose a problem. They overheat, sometimes catch fire, as we all seen in that video where the two engineers were trapped on top of one. When it overheated and caught fire. Do you think we can increase the efficiency of storing more than 30% of that energy, if we develop solutions such as the batteries, instead of building these machines bigger? In some cases bigger is not always better !
 
  • #12
In a city,there is a great deal of turbulence and varying wind directions around large buildings.I think that collector inlets at diferent sides and heights could duct wind energy to a common wind vane.That way,some variation could be averaged out,and energetic velocity better maintained.Analysis might also pinpoint structure locations with a more constant wind under all conditions.
 
  • #13
Rerry said:
Do you think we can increase the efficiency of storing more than 30% of that energy, if we develop solutions such as the batteries, instead of building these machines bigger?
A big problem with batteries is finite lifespan. You have to figure in the cost of replacing the batteries periodically. Whereas if you restrict energy consumption only to times when the wind is blowing then you will get more efficiency and lower cost.
 
  • #14
Recycler said:
In a city,there is a great deal of turbulence and varying wind directions around large buildings.I think that collector inlets at diferent sides and heights could duct wind energy to a common wind vane.That way,some variation could be averaged out,and energetic velocity better maintained.Analysis might also pinpoint structure locations with a more constant wind under all conditions.

  1. Talk to people who own sailboats. They have 20,000 years of experience trying to get the most out of wind in many circumstances.
  2. Go to a rooftop with binoculars in the city. Look for flags on flagposts. How many are moving? How many in different directions? You can test your hypothesis with actual visual data.
  3. Take an inexpensive hand held anamomiter to locations you think would be good and record your observations. Again, you can test your own hypothesis with your own data.
 
  • #15
It's just daft putting turbines in cites. Most have good grid connections so put the turbines outside cities where the wind is stronger. Better still put them offshore. Use roof spaces for solar.
 
  • #16
anorlunda said:
  1. Talk to people who own sailboats. They have 20,000 years of experience trying to get the most out of wind in many circumstances.
  2. Go to a rooftop with binoculars in the city. Look for flags on flagposts. How many are moving? How many in different directions? You can test your hypothesis with actual visual data.
  3. Take an inexpensive hand held anamomiter to locations you think would be good and record your observations. Again, you can test your own hypothesis with your own data.
Yes.I was thinking of walking on a particular side of a tall building and having my raincoat stripped off by the wind,while elsewhere it was calmer.Many of the people who are already experts in utilizing the wind are employed in commercial organizations.If I wish to experiment,I am able,but don't expect to be welcome experimenting at someone's real estate location.These concepts I throw out are in the hopes of stimulating more rapid advancement by the experts.Please see my post about increased efficiency in this thread.I specifically thought a mechanical arrangement would utilize wind energy at very low wind speeds to marginally increase overall utilization,friction being a loss in the process.I could build a model myself,but after checking the innovation and patenting environment,I would expect great difficulty in gaining wide exposure of the idea.Perhaps this is a better way here.
 
  • #17
David Lewis said:
A big problem with batteries is finite lifespan. You have to figure in the cost of replacing the batteries periodically. Whereas if you restrict energy consumption only to times when the wind is blowing then you will get more efficiency and lower cost.
From the recent reports I have seen on popular science sites,I have come to expect very significant new developments in battery tech that will overcome many of the problems in storing electricity.Among those are flow batteries and nano carbon batteries.Also,going to the grid allows utilities to deal with the storage problem.We've already seen a revolution in batteries with the introduction of Lithium-ion batteries in consumer products.Expect more soon.
 
  • #18
As I understand it there is plenty of scope to double or triple typical energy densities. The problem appears to be making the electrodes robust enough to give the cells a long enough life. What happens is that in order to improve density you need electrodes with a large surface area eg porous/textured. This makes them fragile and they can degrade as the cells are physically stressed during the charge/discharge cycle. The trick will be to find a way to solve this problem and I think that's where a lot of research is being done.
 
  • #19
Recycler said:
Wind turbines apparently now produce electricity only at some minimum wind speed.In my conception,the wind pressure of a lower wind speed is used to exert a force on a diaphragm or vane which stores torque in a spring or other mechanism,This torque could be used to help overcome the initial friction when the blade begins to move again in a sufficient incident wind velocity,Could this improve efficiency marginally?The torque coupling could disengage with a preset rotational speed.
The fundamental problem is that available energy is proportional to the square of the wind speed. There is so little energy available at low wind speeds that it is simply not worth increasing the complexity of the turbine. Increased complexity increases construction and maintenance costs, while reducing reliability.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters, CalcNerd and mheslep

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K