With math be the same everywhere?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether mathematics is universally consistent across different universes, particularly in the context of speculative theories about the existence of other universes and their potential differences in physical laws. Participants explore the implications of these ideas on the nature of mathematics itself, considering both philosophical and foundational aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that mathematics is independent of physical reality and will be the same everywhere.
  • Others suggest that while mathematical truths may hold universally, foundational assumptions could differ, leading to variations in higher-level results.
  • One participant questions the axiomatic nature of mathematics, proposing that its foundations are influenced by physical experiences and cognitive processes, which may vary in other universes.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for a clear definition of mathematics, arguing that its applicability could change based on the context of a universe, potentially leading to scenarios where certain mathematical concepts do not apply.
  • Another participant presents a hypothetical universe where uniformity might render traditional mathematical operations, like addition, meaningless due to a lack of distinguishable entities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the universality of mathematics. While some believe in its consistency across universes, others raise concerns about the foundational aspects and applicability of mathematics in different contexts, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in defining mathematics and its dependence on foundational assumptions, which may not hold in alternate realities. These discussions reflect a range of philosophical perspectives on the nature of mathematical truths.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
It is sometimes claimed that the laws of physics might be different in "other universes", if they do in fact exist. (Highly speculative).

Will math, though, be the same everywhere?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Go to another universe and tell us what you find.
 
Math is independent of anything physical. Yes, it will be "the same everywhere".
 
Over the years, I've come to appreciate the philosophy from quantum mechanics: only observable, measurable quantities are relevant. So I never worry about what happens in other universes, or what happened before the Big Bang. We are unable to detect any effect from those scenarios, so it doesn't matter.
 
Yes, I think math will be the same everywhere.

. . .

BUT, I think that the foundational assumptions will be different, so higher-level results still might not match. 100 years ago Frege's set theory was all the rage, and now ZFC is pretty well accepted. In a hundred years I doubt either will have a major place in math. And that's just this planet. :D
 
Perhaps not necessary the same?

Spontaneously one may regard it axiomatic, that mathematics is the same independently
of external circumstances.

But is this really true? For instance the fundament of mathematics, the axioms, is resting on basic experiences of our physical world - our laws of physics and also our way of thinking and perceive things,
the logic qualities of our brains. These fundamentals may be different in an "other world".
Perhaps you may regard the fundamental logics (and consequently also mathematics resting on logics) as in fact basic physics.

A given set of mathematical statements may be consistent also in an other worlds - but may be interpreted in a different way. :confused:
 
Last edited:
What is mathematics though? We need a definition of mathematics before we can ask whether or not it is the same everywhere.

For instance, if I say that it is proven truths that hold in the theories that we have examined (such as in Set Theory or in Number Theory or something), then yes, these are true everywhere since the things that we have proved are independent of everything except for themselves (whether or not there is anything that they can be applied to though is a different question)

If you defined mathematics to be the theories that have any kind of regular application, then I'd say no. You might end up in some weird place where you can't find any things to add together, so addition doesn't make any sense. For instance, maybe you're in a universe where every looks the same (maybe some kind of uniform distribution of stuff) all around you, as far out as you can see, and it still looks exactly the same if you look closer or further out. Then there are no things to add; it doesn't make any sense to try to measure things, etc. So the real numbers are not applicable. People in this universe would probably not think to invent them because they have nothing in their world that they'd think to apply them to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K