Wolfgang Pauli was certainly interested in psychology

  • Thread starter Thread starter ah87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pauli Psychology
AI Thread Summary
Wolfgang Pauli's interest in psychology highlights the interplay between quantitative and qualitative aspects of reality, suggesting that both physical and psychical elements are compatible. Understanding the physical properties of perceived objects is crucial for grasping how we perceive our environment. The discussion raises the possibility of a scientific discipline that bridges psychology and physics, particularly in the study of perception. It emphasizes that our visual experience is constructed by the brain, relying on memory and expectations to shape our understanding of the world. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexity of perception and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to study it effectively.
ah87
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I know it's an area that mostly psychologists/cognitive scientists/neuroscientists are into. Wolfgang Pauli was certainly interested in psychology and of course there are the works of Penrose and Stapp on consciousness which no one knows what to make of. . .

"The only acceptable point of view appears to be the one that recognizes both sides of reality—the quantitative and the qualitative, the physical and the psychical—as compatible with each other, and can embrace them simultaneously."
(Pauli 1955, p. 208)

This quote should probably be interpreted differently, but an understanding of the physical properties (for example, optics) of the objects that are perceived should be a very important step in understanding how we perceive our physical surroundings. One also might wonder if there's a scientific discipline bridging psychology/psychophysics (not so much neuroscience) and physics.

I've heard and read about (maybe once or twice) physicists studying perception, but haven't been able to find much. Maybe there's an area of physics that covers this sort of thing. I would really appreciate it if someone could point me to it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


We see with the brain. We construct a model of the world inside our heads. By use of our memory and expectations we create a visual idea of our surroundings. And we only use the optic input to correct and refresh this construction. We see what we ecspect to see unless we are contradited by our senses.

So there is a very long way from the optic input in the eyes to how we experience the world. The gap is huge. Many sciences bridge the gap: bio-chemistry of course i one. Any science that is involved in trying to understand and model how the brain works.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top