Wolfram answer for cubed root of -1

  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddoria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
AI Thread Summary
WolframAlpha provides a complex approximation for the cube root of -1, specifically yielding a result of 1/2 + i√3/2, which is not the only solution. The discussion highlights that the cube root of a negative number has multiple values in the complex plane, typically represented as points on a circle. The principal value returned by Mathematica is based on a specific definition of n-th roots, focusing on the primary solution. To obtain all possible cube roots, users can utilize the Solve function in Mathematica. Understanding these nuances clarifies why the output does not simply state -1.
daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
At http://www.wolframalpha.com/ , if you type:

1) (-1)^(1/3)

It gives a complex approximation. Isn't it exactly -1?

David
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The solution Wolfram gave you is {1 \over {2}} + i\sqrt{3}/2. Cube it and see what you get
 
daviddoria said:
At http://www.wolframalpha.com/ , if you type:

1) (-1)^(1/3)

It gives a complex approximation. Isn't it exactly -1?

David

That's one answer. There is also {\rm e^i}^{{{\pi}\over{3}}} and {\rm e^-^i}^{{{\pi}\over{3}}}

Generally, the n'th root has n values if you include complex numbers. The solutions are on a circle in the complex plane at equal radius from the origin and separated from each other by an angle of 2pi/n.
 
So they are just giving the first solution? I'm confused why it doesn't say, -1, e^{i\pi / 3}, e^{-i\pi / 3} ?
 
Mathematica always returns the principal value for a multi-valued function. So if we define:

z^{1/3}=r^{1/3} e^{\frac{i}{3}(\theta+2n\pi)},\quad n=0,1,2

then the principal value is:

r^{1/3}e^{i/3\theta},\quad -\pi<\theta\leq \pi

so that Mathematica returns for:

(-1)^{1/3}=e^{i/3(\pi)}

if you wanted all three, enter:

Solve[z^3==-1,z]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top