# Wolfram releases the free Wolfram Engine for Developers

• Featured

#### Ackbach

Gold Member
Wolfram made what I would call a gigantic move: they released the Wolfram Engine for Developers - for zero cost!

The idea of the Engine is primarily that you can call and run Wolfram Language commands from lots of different sources. I am not the kind of person to automate Mathematica, although I'm sure many others are. For me, the attraction is that you can download it for Windows, Mac, or Linux (might even run on a Raspberry Pi), install it, and run full-blown Mathematica commands on your own computer!

To be sure, the Wolfram Development Platform, now simply renamed to the Wolfram Cloud, has allowed free accounts, and you can execute Wolfram Language commands there in a sort of notebook. But the limitation was always that if you had a command taking a long time to execute, it might abort because of not having enough server time. Now that limitation is gone: you decide how long you want it to execute!

You still don't get palettes and other nice display-type things, as those are reserved for Mathematica proper. Moreover, the Wolfram Engine has an even more primitive display than the Cloud. However, you can always ask for the output in $\LaTeX$ format by doing
Code:
//TeXForm
at the end of a command.

I predict this will greatly enhance usage of the Wolfram Language and Mathematica, as it has always been so amazingly expensive, particularly for commercial users.

Highly recommended!

Note that you are limited to two copies per Wolfram ID.

Last edited:
Related MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX, Etc News on Phys.org

#### Wrichik Basu

Gold Member
2018 Award
One of the main reasons why I chose to learn Matlab before Mathematica is the high price of the latter. The Matlab mobile app is free, and the cost of the software is still affordable. But Mathematica Student is out-of-bounds. (Matlab also has free alternatives, but that is a different story.)

Thanks for the information. It seems that I can finally learn Mathematica too.

#### Ackbach

Gold Member
Mathematica/Wolfram Language absolutely rules the symbolic world. I think MATLAB is probably the best for numerical calculations, as it makes matrix syntax so easy (it "thinks" in vectors). These days, though, if Mathematica can't do a symbolic integral, I'm usually going to say that it can't be done.

#### Dale

Mentor
This is awesome! I have been a Mathematica user for 23 years now. I am stunned that they are giving it away now.

#### Greg Bernhardt

Wolfram is a business, I wonder what their angle is on this? Have they moved on to private custom business/science applications?

#### Ackbach

Gold Member
Wolfram is a business, I wonder what their angle is on this? Have they moved on to private custom business/science applications?
It's the old Joel Spolsky routine: 1. Get users for some free portion of your service, because without users you have nothing. 2. Offer some premium payed services related to the free portion, but always keep part of it free.

#### PAllen

Mathematica/Wolfram Language absolutely rules the symbolic world. I think MATLAB is probably the best for numerical calculations, as it makes matrix syntax so easy (it "thinks" in vectors). These days, though, if Mathematica can't do a symbolic integral, I'm usually going to say that it can't be done.
That last is not true. Not long ago I had an integral that Mathematica couldn’t solve. I did what I considered the most obvious substitution. Mathematica could then solve the rest. I corresponded with them, and they said Mathematica does not actually do substitutions. Instead, it uses a series of very general reductions that “almost always” obviate the need for substitutions or integration by parts. However, once in a while, there are integrals like the one I had, where it can’t get started without help. So never forget substitution, by parts, or partial fractions. You still need to know them.

#### Ackbach

Gold Member
That last is not true. Not long ago I had an integral that Mathematica couldn’t solve. I did what I considered the most obvious substitution. Mathematica could then solve the rest. I corresponded with them, and they said Mathematica does not actually do substitutions. Instead, it uses a series of very general reductions that “almost always” obviate the need for substitutions or integration by parts. However, once in a while, there are integrals like the one I had, where it can’t get started without help. So never forget substitution, by parts, or partial fractions. You still need to know them.
I did say "usually", and non-universal generalizations are not disproved by a counterexample. You're quite right that we still need to know our integration techniques; I usually have told my students that they need to know what a technology is doing before they're allowed to use it.

#### MathematicalPhysicist

Gold Member
Mathematica/Wolfram Language absolutely rules the symbolic world. I think MATLAB is probably the best for numerical calculations, as it makes matrix syntax so easy (it "thinks" in vectors). These days, though, if Mathematica can't do a symbolic integral, I'm usually going to say that it can't be done.
Maple handle the job as well.

I have used both and I much prefer maple for its affordability.
I once asked how much does cost mathematica for a student per year, and they gave me the price of 1500 shekels while maple and matlab each per year cost 400.

And for calculations in PDE, linear algebra, analysis I don't see any point in using mathematica.

#### Dale

Mentor
My experience with Maple is about 20 years ago, but it was very unstable back then. It would crash frequently while the then-current version of Mathematica was reliable. As a result I just didn’t trust Maple from a quality standpoint then, and so I never used it since.

#### fluidistic

Gold Member
Mathematica/Wolfram Language absolutely rules the symbolic world. I think MATLAB is probably the best for numerical calculations, as it makes matrix syntax so easy (it "thinks" in vectors). These days, though, if Mathematica can't do a symbolic integral, I'm usually going to say that it can't be done.
There are many performance tests done on several CAS, some results are published in the google group https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sci.math.symbolic. Time taken to solve thousands of ODE's, integrals, etc. is reported with the % of completion for several versions of these CAS.
So if you look deep enough, you should find probably hundreds of integrals mathematica isn't able to perform that other CAS are able to.

#### MathematicalPhysicist

Gold Member
My experience with Maple is about 20 years ago, but it was very unstable back then. It would crash frequently while the then-current version of Mathematica was reliable. As a result I just didn’t trust Maple from a quality standpoint then, and so I never used it since.
The big question is what Mathematica can do that Maple can't?

#### Ackbach

Gold Member
The big question is what Mathematica can do that Maple can't?
From the Maple side.
From the Mathematica side.

As a side note, the comparison isn't really what this post is about. I've linked to the free engine, you can download it or not. This post isn't primarily about comparing Mathematica to Maple, MATLAB, or Mathcad or anything else.

#### eys_physics

Thanks for sharing.

"Wolfram releases the free Wolfram Engine for Developers"

### Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving