Women passing exams: Help with stats please

tempguy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am looking at the stats for a particular academic test:

- In 2007, 11 women out of 50 candidates took the test; there were only 3 women among the 16 successful candidates.
- In 2009, 12 women out of 52 candidates took the test; there was only 1 woman women among the 14 successful candidates.

The same results in percentages:

- Women accounted for 18.7% of successful candidates in 2007, which is more or less normal insofar as they represented 22% of the candidates taking the test that year (11/50).
- However, women accounted for 7% of successful candidates in 2009, whereas they constituted 23% of all candidates taking the test that year (12/52).

I would like to calculate the probability of this last result, assuming the following:

a) Women and men taking the exam are supposed to have equal chances of succeeding (also known as the anti-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers#Differences_between_the_sexes"…).
b) The exams are supposed to be independent events (Bernoulli trials?).

How should I proceed please?

My educated guess is that binomial regression is the way to go but my stats skills are too low to actually perform the operation, or to analyse correctly its results.

If the probability of the 2009 results are very low, then one might reasonably assume that there is an anti-women bias at play (the test is basically a face-to-face interview).

Help much appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if you assume they have the same probability of passing (say p), then each person is a Bernoulli trial. So you have a binomial distribution (which is the sum of Bernoulli trials) for the amount of people that pass. You want \mathbb{P}(\text{someone passes the test, given they were a women})=\frac{\mathbb{P}(\text{they pass the the test and they are a woman})}{\mathbb{P}(\text{they are a woman})}.

If you want to check if they are biased then I suggest making a hypothesis test.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top