Word problem involving algebra/angles

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arringar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around a word problem involving the calculation of the radius of the Sun based on its angular size as compared to the Moon. Participants explore various methods of solving the problem, including geometric reasoning and algebraic manipulation, while addressing the assumptions involved in celestial measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a detailed explanation of how to calculate the radius of the Sun using the angular sizes of the Sun and Moon.
  • Another participant suggests using similar triangles to relate the distances and radii of the Sun and Moon, providing a sketch to illustrate the concept.
  • A different participant introduces a more complex approach, discussing center-to-center distances and deriving relationships using algebraic expressions, while also noting that the same conclusion could be reached with simpler reasoning based on similarity.
  • This participant also mentions the implicit assumption that the Sun and Moon subtend the same angle at the zenith and discusses the variability of their angular sizes during different configurations, such as eclipses.
  • Further details are provided regarding the angular sizes of the Sun and Moon, noting that they typically subtend about 0.5 degrees, with some variations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of the problem and the methods used to solve it. While some agree on the use of similar triangles, others propose more intricate algebraic approaches. There is no consensus on a single method being superior or universally applicable.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the assumptions involved in the calculations, such as the distances being center-to-center and the angular sizes being equal under specific conditions. The discussion highlights the limitations of the methods used and the potential for variations in angular measurements.

Arringar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The Sun, at a distance of 149.6 million km from Earth, subtends about the same angle in the sky as does the Moon, with a radius of 1737 km at a distance of 384,400 km from Earth. Use this information to find the radius of the Sun in km. Round your answer to three significant figures.

Can someone show me (in detail) how to solve this, please? I want to understand the concepts thoroughly so the more detailed the explanation the better.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, Arringar!

Did you make a sketch?

The Sun, at a distance of 149.6 million km from Earth,
subtends about the same angle in the sky as does the Moon,
with a radius of 1737 km at a distance of 384,400 km from Earth.
Use this information to find the radius of the Sun in km.
Round your answer to three significant figures.
Code:
                                          * S
                                    *     |
      :- 384,400 -:           *           |
                  M     *                 |
                  *                       |
            *     |O                      |
    E * - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - - * U
            *     | 1737                  |
                  *                       |
                  N     *                 | r
                              *           |
                                    *     |
                                          * N
      : - - - - -  149,600,000  - - - - - :
The Earth is at E.

The Moon's diameter is MN; its radius is ON = 1737 km.
Its distance is EO = 384,\!400 km.

The Sun's diameter is SN; its radius is UN = r km.
Its distance is EU = 149,\!600,\!000 km.

From similar triangles, we have: .\frac{r}{1737} \:=\:\frac{149,\!600,\!000}{384,\!400}

Solve for r.
 
I am certain the method soroban has posted (or something similar) is what you are expected to use, but...let's see if we can make it a bit more complicated.(Tmi)

Normally, distances between celestial bodies is center-to-center. Let's assume our observer is on the line which connects the centers of the the Earth and the other bodies.

For the calculations to follow, please refer to this diagram:

View attachment 497

$\displaystyle d$ is the distance from the observer to the surface of the other body, either the Moon or the Sun.

$\displaystyle L$ is the distance to the horizon, or line of sight. $\displaystyle A+C=R$.

By similarity, we have:

$\displaystyle \frac{L}{C+d}=\frac{R+d}{L}$

We want to find $\displaystyle C$ in terms of $\displaystyle R$ and $\displaystyle d$:

$\displaystyle \frac{L}{C+d}=\frac{R+d}{L}$

$\displaystyle L^2=(C+d)(R+d)=CR+Cd+dR+d^2$

By Pythagoras, we also have:

$\displaystyle L^2=(R+d)^2-R^2=2dR+d^2$ thus:

$\displaystyle CR+Cd+dR+d^2=2dR+d^2$

$\displaystyle C(R+d)=dR$

$\displaystyle C=\frac{dR}{R+d}$

$\displaystyle L=\sqrt{d(2R+d)}$

Now, if we subscript measures pertaining to the Moon with $\displaystyle M$ and those pertaining to the Sun with $\displaystyle S$, we have by similarity:

$\displaystyle \frac{L_S}{C_S+d_S}=\frac{L_M}{C_M+d_M}$

$\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{d_S(2R_S+d_S)}}{\frac{d_SR_S}{R_S+d_S}+d_S}=\frac{\sqrt{d_M(2R_M+d_M)}}{\frac{d_MR_M}{R_M+d_M}+d_M}$

$\displaystyle \frac{(R_S+d_S)\sqrt{d_S(2R_S+d_S)}}{d_S(2R_S+d_S)}=\frac{(R_M+d_M)\sqrt{d_M(2R_M+d_M)}}{d_M(2R_M+d_M)}$

$\displaystyle \frac{R_S+d_S}{\sqrt{d_S(2R_S+d_S)}}=\frac{R_M+d_M}{\sqrt{d_M(2R_M+d_M)}}$

$\displaystyle (R_S+d_S)\sqrt{d_M(2R_M+d_M)}=(R_M+d_M)\sqrt{d_S(2R_S+d_S)}$

$\displaystyle (R_S+d_S)^2d_M(2R_M+d_M)=(R_M+d_M)^2d_S(2R_S+d_S)$

$\displaystyle d_S(R_S+(R_S+d_S))=\frac{(R_S+d_S)^2d_M(2R_M+d_M)}{(R_M+d_M)^2}$

Now, if we observe that (where the radius of the Earth is $\displaystyle R_E$):

$\displaystyle R_S+d_S=r_S-R_E$

$\displaystyle R_M+d_M=r_M-R_E$

where:

$\displaystyle r_S$ is the center-to center distance from the Earth to the Sun,

$\displaystyle r_M$ is the center-to center distance from the Earth to the Moon,

then we have:

$\displaystyle ((r_S-R_E)-R_S)(R_S+(r_S-R_E))=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2(r_M-(R_E+R_M))(R_M+r_M-R_E)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}$

$\displaystyle (R_S+(r_S-R_E))(R_S-(r_S-R_E))=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2((R_E+R_M)-r_M)(R_M+r_M-R_E)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}$

$\displaystyle R_S^2-(r_S-R_E)^2=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2((R_E+R_M)-r_M)(R_M+r_M-R_E)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}$

$\displaystyle R_S^2=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2((R_E+R_M)-r_M)(R_M+r_M-R_E)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}+(r_S-R_E)^2$

$\displaystyle R_S^2=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2\left(((R_E+R_M)-r_M)(R_M+r_M-R_E)+(r_M-R_E)^2 \right)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}$

$\displaystyle R_S^2=\frac{(r_S-R_E)^2\left((R_M-(r_M-R_E))(R_M+(r_M-R_E))+(r_M-R_E)^2 \right)}{(r_M-R_E)^2}$

$\displaystyle R_S^2=\left(\frac{R_M(r_S-R_E)}{(r_M-R_E)} \right)^2$

Taking the positive root, we have:

$\displaystyle R_S=\frac{R_M(r_S-R_E)}{r_M-R_E}$

All that, only to find that since the Sun and Moon subtend the same angle, the observer is seeing the same portion of the surface, which can be shown using calculus to be given by:

$\displaystyle \frac{d}{2(R+d)}$

I thought we were to essentially make the assumption that we were viewing half of the surfaces of the Sun and the Moon, i.e., using:

$\displaystyle \lim_{d\to\infty}\frac{d}{2(R+d)}=\frac{1}{2}$

so that we could use similarity, but in fact, similarity is preserved without this assumption. From the very beginning then, we could have simply stated:

$\displaystyle \frac{R_S}{R_M}=\frac{r_S-R_E}{r_M-R_E}$

and avoided the vast majority of the algebra above.(Smirk)

So, using $\displaystyle R_E=6378.1\text{ km}$ and the other given values, we find (to 3 decimal places):

$\displaystyle R_S\approx6.87\times10^5\text{ km}$
 

Attachments

  • lineofsight.jpg
    lineofsight.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 83
MarkFL said:
I am certain the method soroban has posted (or something similar) is what you are expected to use, but...let's see if we can make it a bit more complicated.(Tmi)

Normally, distances between celestial bodies is center-to-center. Let's assume our observer is on the line which connects the centers of the the Earth and the other bodies.

For the calculations to follow, please refer to this diagram:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/497

<...snip...>

so that we could use similarity, but in fact, similarity is preserved without this assumption. From the very beginning then, we could have simply stated:

$\displaystyle \frac{R_S}{R_M}=\frac{r_S-R_E}{r_M-R_E}$

and avoided the vast majority of the algebra above.(Smirk)

So, using $\displaystyle R_E=6378.1\text{ km}$ and the other given values, we find (to 3 decimal places):

$\displaystyle R_S\approx6.87\times10^5\text{ km}$

There is an implicit assumption here that the Sun and Moon subtend the same angle when they are at the zenith, but you can experience the Sun rising totally eclipsed, when to all intents and purposes you could ignore the size of the Earth.

In fact with the right configuration the Moon subtends a smaller angle that the Sun and you can get an annular eclipse. (Typically the Moon subtends a greater angle that the Sun by ~0.5 minutes of arc but has a greater variation that the Sun (~2.5 as opposed to ~0.5 minutes of arc)

Further info: the Sun and Moon both subtend about 1/2 a degree (30 minutes of arc ~9 milli-radian, which is about the same angle a 5mm at arms length - yes I just measured my arms length to check that)

CB
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K