Wording question regards angles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
To differentiate between two angles θ and θ_{1} mathematically, it is suggested to reference them using three points that denote a triangle, where the order of points indicates the angle's orientation. The conventional notation helps clarify the angle's position and direction without needing terms like "leftward facing" or "rightward facing." For advanced geometry, understanding concepts like determinants and the wedge product can assist in incorporating orientation into vector algebra. This approach allows for distinguishing angles based on their vector representation. Overall, using established geometric conventions is recommended for clarity in describing angles.
Benn
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have two angles:

θ:
2r4kdbc.jpg


and θ_{1}:
24c5qo1.jpg


θ_{1} = θ

How do I differentiate the two angles? I want to say "leftward facing" and "rightward facing", but I'm not sure how to "mathematically." Note that I must talk about the angle that's between 0-90 degrees.

Thanks,
Ben
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey Benn and welcome to the forums.

In terms of an 'angle' as a quantity, we don't differentiate them in the way that you have described.

However what is done in geometry is that we can reference an angle in terms of three points. The three points denote a triangle where the order of the point denotes the angle and its orientation. For example if we denote ABC as an angle then given points A, B, and C the angle is formed by looking at the interior of the triangle ABC where the angle is between the points A and C.

The idea can be applied to higher levels of geometry where orientation comes in, but for your kind of geometry that you are describing, it probably might be better if you use the above convention.

If you are interested in orientation in high level geometry, then you need to understand the determinant and the wedge product. It would help you to understand three-dimensional vector algebra which includes the cross-product which helps identify methods to incorporate orientation (your left facing and right facing angles) in a way that one orientation produces one vector and the reverse orientation produces a vector that is opposite to that vector.

If you are going to do the above, you have to treat your lines as vectors and speak about things in that context.

Have you ever learned about vectors or vectors and geometry before? What mathematical background do you have?
 
If in your context, your angles are going to be in specific places, maybe you want to refer to one of them as being in the first quadrant and the other one in the second...maybe?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top