Work Against Gravity: Understanding Force and Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter jldibble
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Work
AI Thread Summary
When lifting a 1.0 kg ball to a height of 1.0 meter, the work done against gravity is 10 joules, which corresponds to the gravitational potential energy (GPE) gained. If the ball is lifted with a force of 15 Newtons, the work done is 15 joules, resulting in additional kinetic energy (KE) beyond the GPE. The confusion arises from the assumption that the work done should be the same regardless of the force applied, but lifting with greater force increases the total work done. The work-energy theorem states that the work done equals the change in energy, confirming that the extra work contributes to KE. Thus, the ball ends up with 10 joules of GPE and 5 joules of KE when lifted with a force greater than its weight.
jldibble
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I'm figuring that this has been asked before, but I couldn't locate a previous thread.

Here's my problem:

A 1.0 kg ball is lifted at a constant speed to a height of 1.0 meter above the ground. The work done to the ball against gravity is about 10 joules.

The same 1.0 kg ball is lifted with a force of 15 Newtons to a height of 1.0 meter above the ground. The work done to the ball in this case is 15 joules.


What is getting me confused is that the work done to lift the ball 1.0 meter should be the same no matter what. And the work energy theorem says that a 1.0 kg object 1.0 meter above the ground should have a GPE of 10 joules. So my problem is with lifting objects with a force greater than their weight.

What am I getting mixed up here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jldibble said:
A 1.0 kg ball is lifted at a constant speed to a height of 1.0 meter above the ground. The work done to the ball against gravity is about 10 joules.
That's the minimum amount of work you need to do to just lift the ball against gravity.

The same 1.0 kg ball is lifted with a force of 15 Newtons to a height of 1.0 meter above the ground. The work done to the ball in this case is 15 joules.
Here you did more work that necessary to lift the ball. So that extra work goes into the increased KE of the ball.

What is getting me confused is that the work done to lift the ball 1.0 meter should be the same no matter what.
No, not really.

And the work energy theorem says that a 1.0 kg object 1.0 meter above the ground should have a GPE of 10 joules.
No, the work energy theorem just says that the work you do must equal the change in energy of the object. And it does!
 
You are correct, the 15 N force will result in 15 J of work done. At the end the ball will have 10 J of GPE and 5 J of KE.
 
Oh, of course... Easy enough. Thanks!
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to work out Joules needed to perform work
Replies
16
Views
7K
Work-Energy Theorem: Is Lifting a Rigid Body Really 0 Work?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Why does the work done by a weightlifter result in a net energy loss?
Replies
24
Views
3K
Why Does Pulley Require Less Work to Lift Mass?
Replies
6
Views
7K
How does gravity convert potential energy to kinetic?
Replies
2
Views
1K
What Does Negative Potential Energy Indicate in Colliding Iron Balls in Space?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Non-conservative work energy theorem and potential energy
Replies
3
Views
2K
Side kick on a falling object, mechanical energy and work
Replies
16
Views
3K
Who Exerts Gravity Power? Force x Velocity Dot Product
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top