Work done by a spring & its potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work-energy theorem and its application to spring forces. It clarifies that the equation W = K(final) - K(initial) + U(final) - U(initial) describes external work done on a system, and if no energy is added or lost, the relationship simplifies accordingly. A key point raised is the confusion regarding the application of U(final) - U(initial) under varying conditions of spring extension, particularly when displacement may not align with the force direction. Additionally, there is a correction regarding the spring force, emphasizing that it is F = -kx, not 0.5kx², which pertains to potential energy stored in the spring. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing spring mechanics.
Archit Patke
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
According to work - mechanical energy theorem ,
W = K(final) - K(initial) + U(final) - U(initial) . . . . (1)
as we define Potential energy as negative of work done by conservative force and assuming that the only force in this situation is Spring force then ,
W(spring) = K(final) - K(initial)
As work done is calculated by finding component of spring force in direction of displacement. How can we say that U(final) - U(initial) applies for all possible conditions of extension of spring as displacement may not be in direction of force ?
Spring force = 0.5kx2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Archit Patke said:
According to work - mechanical energy theorem ,
W = K(final) - K(initial) + U(final) - U(initial) . . . . (1)
as we define Potential energy as negative of work done by conservative force and assuming that the only force in this situation is Spring force then ,
W(spring) = K(final) - K(initial)
As work done is calculated by finding component of spring force in direction of displacement. How can we say that U(final) - U(initial) applies for all possible conditions of extension of spring as displacement may not be in direction of force ?
Spring force = 0.5kx2
Welcome to PF!

First of all, your equation (1) defines the external work done by/on a system. If no energy is added or lost (Wext = 0), Kf + Uf = Ki + Ui.

Second, your question is not clear. What do you mean when you say U(final) - U(initial) applies? U(final) - U(initial) is not a mathematical statement.

Finally, your statement: Spring force = 0.5kx2 is not correct. F = -kx.

AM
 
Finally, your statement: Spring force = 0.5kx2 is not correct. F = -kx.

In case this was a simple slip, the formula


W = \frac{1}{2}k{e^2}

W = work, e = extension, k = spring constant

Refers to the work done in extending a spring = potential energy stored in that spring on extension.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top