Work Done by Spring at A: Calculating from Position 2 to Position 3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a torsion spring as a uniform bar rotates from position 2 to position 3. The correct approach involves integrating the counterclockwise couple function, C(θ) = -10θ, with appropriate limits of integration based on the equilibrium position. The initial calculation yielded -3.8 N·m, but the correct answer is -8.38 N·m, highlighting the importance of accurately setting integration limits relative to the equilibrium position. Participants emphasize the need to consider equilibrium conditions in solving such problems. Overall, understanding the relationship between positions and equilibrium is crucial for accurate calculations.
maniac90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The torsion spring at A applies the counterclockwise couple C(θ)= − 10θ N · m to the uniform bar.The angle θ (in radians) is measured counterclockwise
from position 1, where the spring is undeformed.

Calculate the work done by the spring on the bar as it rotates from position 2 to position 3.

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/1696/182z.jpg


Homework Equations



U1-2 = ∫C dθ

U1-2 = C(θ2 − θ1)= C Δθ

The Attempt at a Solution



U1-2 = ∫− 10θ dθ = -10∫θ dθ

= -10 (1/2) θ2

50° = 5π/18 rad

U1-2 = -3.8

I am not sure if that is the correct way of solving it, any guidance would be helpful
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
I just checked the book. The answer says it is −8.38 N·m
I can't figure out what I am doing wrong
 
Oh, here's the issue. Sorry I didn't check more closely before. I think your limits of integration were off. It should be

W = \int^{\theta = 4\pi/9}_{\theta = \pi/6} -10\theta d\theta

because the equilibrium position of the system is at position 1, where \theta = 0. You want to find the work done by the spring moving from position 2 (\theta = \frac{\pi}{6}, relative to position 1) to position 3 (\theta = \frac{4\pi}{9}, with respect to position 1).
 
So the moral of the story is that it's highly important to take into account your equilibrium conditions and how the interactions occur relative to the equilibrium conditions. It's also important for people who answer questions on PF not to get ahead of themselves and forget (like I did here) to check that the approach the OP takes is duly considerate of the equilibrium conditions and their relation to the conditions stated as the bounds of the problem.
 
That helped me a lot. Thank you very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top