Work-Energy Theorem Algebraic Representation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a car accelerating up a slope, where the goal is to determine the total work done by external forces. Participants clarify that the angle of the slope and static friction do not impact the calculation of work since the change in kinetic energy is the primary focus. The work-energy theorem is emphasized, stating that the change in kinetic energy equals the total work done, leading to the conclusion that static friction is irrelevant in this context. The final consensus is that the work done can be expressed algebraically in terms of the initial and final velocities, without needing to factor in friction or the slope's angle. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and principles behind the work-energy theorem.
Chrismartin33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car of mass m accelerates from speed v1 to speed v2 while going up a slope that makes an angle θ with the horizontal. The coefficient of static friction is μs, and the acceleration due to gravity is g.
Find the total work W done on the car by the external forces.

Homework Equations


Wnet = .5mv22 - .5mv12
W=F*d
W=|F|*|d|*cos(theta)
d=displacement

The Attempt at a Solution


The question actually does say it gives me static friction, not sure how that works since it's a kinetic energy question and must be in motion.
I know the motion is up a ramp, but not quite comprehending how the angle (theta) will affect the various components in this work-energy example.
Answer is algebraic, in terms of any of the following: [v1,v2,(theta),us,g]
Please help!

Edit: I do know that Fnet = deltaK/d as well. Not sure if that helps me though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Going to keep this here incase anyone else gets the answer in the future.
I figured out the answer to the question.
The angle has no effect on the question since velocity is already known, it's simply measuring the change in kinetic energy at the top of the ramp minus the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp, and this therefore makes friction an unnecessary portion to the question.
Therefore Wnet=deltaK=.5mv22 - .5mv12
 
Presuming there's no wind-resistance involved in what is described as "static friction", friction-overcoming work is proportional to distance travelled. So work per meter traveled is constant, and is a sum of work to increase speed, elevate mass, and to overcome friction. Then some equation should be achievable, based on distance traveled as a function of acceleration. If wind resistance is involved, then there's some exponential stuff happening. Which complicate things, but may be solved also. Your figuring is wrong, anyway, as friction and elevation affects how much work is required.
 
Last edited:
Vespa71 said:
Your figuring is wrong, anyway, as friction and elevation affects how much work is required.

@Vespa: Read the OP. Find the total work W done on the car by the external forces:
It was not "work required by the engine".
And recall Work-Energy Theorem: The change of kinetic energy is equal to the total work done. The OP's solution is correct.
 
Slapped in the face by definitions, once again. I don't like trick questions too much. A question making my answer correct, would have been a considerably better question. Apologies to Chrismartin33 for my conclusive descriptions. And thanks to ehild for explaining the question in terms that made my journey towards enlightenment possible..

... Humbly Vespa71
 
Thanks Chris, makes sense since the velocity is already accounted for-- my original expression had theta and \mu_s
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top