Work-Energy Theorum: Spring potential energy vs Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 1350-kg car that comes to rest after compressing a horizontal coiled spring. The task is to determine the spring constant, given the car's initial speed and the distance over which it compresses the spring. The context is rooted in the work-energy theorem and the relationship between kinetic energy and spring potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of energy principle, equating kinetic energy to spring potential energy. They express confusion regarding the sign of displacement in the spring's compression and whether the spring constant can be negative.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided clarifications regarding the sign conventions in the equations. There is a consensus that the spring constant must be positive and that the negative sign in the force equation is related to the direction of the force rather than the energy itself. The discussion is focused on resolving the original poster's algebraic misunderstanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's confusion stems from the interpretation of displacement and the change in energy, emphasizing the importance of understanding the signs in the context of work done by the spring.

Senjai
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Work-Energy Theorum: Spring potential energy vs Kinetic Energy

Homework Statement



A 1350-kg car rolling on a horizontal surface has a speed v = 40 km/h when it strikes a horizontal coiled spring and is brought to rest in a distance of 2.5 m. What is the spring constant of the spring? Ignore Friction and assume spring is mass-less.

Homework Equations


[tex]W = \Delta E[/tex]
[tex]E_{pspring} = \frac{1}{2}(kx^2)[/tex]
[tex]E_k = \frac{1}{2}(mv^2)[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



First right off the bat, i converted 40 km/h to its m/s equivalent of aprox. 11.11 m/s

i state the law of conservation of energy: Energy before = Energy after

Therefore:

[tex] E_k = E_{pspring}<br /> \frac{1}{2}(mv^2) = \frac{1}{2}(kx^2)[/tex]

then i isolate k

[tex]k = \frac{-mv^2}{x^2}[/tex]

now here's the issue, is x negative? because the displacement is against the direction of motion?
and 2.5m = x, (-2.5)^2 gives me a answer of 4266 Nm
but -(2.5)^2 is entirely different.. This has been a long lasting math issue for me.

And what if x is positive?

i know k MUST be positive right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(2.5)^2 is correct. There is no negative energy in the nature.
 
There is no minus sign in mv^2 = kx^2
or in k = mv^2/x^2. No way you can get k negative!
The minus sign in F = -kx is supposed to help keep track of the fact that the force of the spring is opposite to the direction of stretch but it does seem to have a habit of getting in the way. k is ALWAYS positive.
 
Thanks, the negative sign on mv^2 was an algebra error... Thanks for the clarification guys!
 
Your attempt is correct but you missed somethingthat for a spring if you take natural length as the datum, the force on change in length is given as:
[tex]\vec{F}= -k \vec{x}[/tex]

and hence work done by a spring against external forces
[tex]W_{s}=\int\vec{F}\vec{.dx}[/tex]
over the required limits

in our case the answer is
[tex]W_{s}=-\frac{kx^{2}}{2}[/tex]
as
[tex]W_{s}=\Delta E[/tex]
[tex]\Delta E=-\frac{mv^{2}}{2}[/tex]
the change part was where you lost it all...the KE FELL TO ZERO. HENCE A NEGATIVE CHANGE.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K