Work & Energy: What is 1.89J of Work? Gravitational & Elastic Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
Work is defined as the product of force and displacement, measured in Joules, which are equivalent to Newton-meters. When 1.89J of work is done, it indicates that a specific amount of force has caused a displacement of an object over a distance. Objects themselves do not store energy; rather, it is the systems that contain them that store energy, such as in the form of potential energy. Gravitational potential energy relates to the position of an object in a gravitational field, while elastic potential energy is associated with the deformation of elastic materials. Understanding these concepts clarifies how energy is transferred and stored within systems.
Moose772
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So work is when a force causes a displacement of an object. So what does it mean when 1.89J of work is done by an applied force? Does it mean this amount of force is needed to cause a displacement? Also how and why does an object store energy? I'm really confused by gravitational and elastic potential energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moose772 said:
So work is when a force causes a displacement of an object. So what does it mean when 1.89J of work is done by an applied force? Does it mean this amount of force is needed to cause a displacement?
Welcome to pf

Joules are the name of the unit of work, but it is just another name for Newton-meters. Newtons are the force. Meters are the distance. Multiply them together and you get the Joules.
Also how and why does an object store energy? I'm really confused by gravitational and elastic potential energy.
Objects don't really store energy except as heat. Systems store energy. Potential energy is the energy between two objects in a system.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top