How Can Work Function Differences Be Measured Without Contact?

shallowbay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I posted this in the "General physics" section as I didn't see the Solid State part of this section.

I am quite confused here. So, I know that if you take any number of materials and place them in series the contact potentials subtract off so that the measured result is simply the difference between the first and last material.

I also know that in a pn junction this is the reason you cannot measure the built-in potential.

However, I was told that one should be able to theoretically measure the work function difference between two metals with different Fermi levels that have not come in contact and thus have not come to an equilibrium Fermi level, using some sort of voltmeter.

How could this be without a Kelvin Probe to measure each one individually?

Is this sensical? How might it be possible? Any comments?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know you can deduce the work function using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, but that has nothing to do with voltmeters.

bump.
 
And it certainly can't be a normal voltmeter as the contact potentials stop you from measuring it that way, but supposedly it is theoretically possible to measure this potential in some electrically based manner as it's an electrochemical potential difference.

I just can't see it without measuring tunnel current or charge based measurements.
 
Yeah, I'm picturing something like a wire with a resistor connecting the two materials.

As electrons flow from one to another the current goes through the resistor and V=IR so you could get the voltage from resistive heating or something.

Again though, like you said, that's based on current measurement. I'll stop suggesting dumb ideas until somebody more knowledgeable comes along lol
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top