Work is positive/negative potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between potential energy change and work done in electric and gravitational fields, emphasizing that the work you do is equal to the change in potential energy (ΔU), while the work done by the field is negative (−ΔU). It uses the example of the Earth-Sun system to illustrate that the work done by the gravitational field is calculated as W = -ΔU, while the work required to move against the field is ΔU. This balance results in zero net work, leading to no kinetic energy and representing minimum work conditions. The conversation also highlights that energy is deposited by the user into the system, as indicated by the potential energy increase from zero to qVb. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of energy transfer in fields.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
I understand that ##\Delta U = -W## and that ##\Delta V = \frac {\Delta U}{q}##
I don't understand why the example below has "set the change in potential energy equal to the (positive of the) work ...
Screenshot (54).png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All this has to do with the notions of the work you have to do and the work which is done by the electric field. Maybe the second type is unfamiliar to you. The work you do is ##\Delta U## the work done by the field is ##-\Delta U##

To take a more terrestrial example you can imagine a system composed of the sun and the Earth :biggrin:. You know the work that the gravitational field does is calculated via ##W=-\Delta U##. However the work that you have to do will be ##\Delta U## since you are opposing the gravitational field. If the field does x and amount of work you do -x. All this adds up to 0 and gives you motion with 0 kinetic energy all through out, therefore its the "minimum work".

Another way to look at this for this particular example is this way:

Your test charge has 0 potential energy at first. At the final stage it has ##qV_{b}##. Where did the energy come from? You put it there. Therefore this way of choosing signs helps you identify you are the one depositing energy.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top