Work to Construct Conducting Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ferbs207
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Final
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to construct a conducting sphere of radius 'a' and charge '+q', one must determine the potential energy at that radius, starting from an initial potential energy of zero. The potential energy at radius 'a' is denoted as U_a. The challenge arises when considering the second sphere of radius 'b' and charge '-q', particularly how to factor in the interactions between the two spheres during construction. The forum emphasizes the importance of following proper guidelines for homework help, including showing relevant equations and previous attempts at the problem. Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurately determining the total work involved in the process.
Ferbs207
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

How much work does it take to construct a conducting sphere of radius 'a' and charge '+q' by pulling charges ('dq') from an infinite distance? Then construct another conducting sphere of radius 'b' and charge '-q' around the sphere of radius 'a'. Given 'a'<'b'.

2. Homework Equations
F=ke(q_1)(q_2)/r^2
E=ke(integral(dq/r^2)
U=integral(F)=1/q(integral(E))
W=delta(U)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

If the charges are initially infinitely far, then the initial potential energy is 0. This means that all I need to do is calculate the potential energy of the sphere at radius 'a', which will be my value for work. Let's say the potential energy at radius 'a' is U_a.

It's the second part of the question that I find difficult. How do I account for the interactions between the two conducting sphere when constructing the second one around it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ferbs207 and welcome to PF. Please follow the rules of this forum and use the template when you seek help with homework. Show us the relevant equations and tell us what you tried and what you think about the problem. We just don't give answers away.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top