Work to move a planet's satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizzyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move a satellite of mass 2230 kg from a circular orbit of radius 2R to one of radius 3R around a planet with a mass of 3.36 X 10^24 kg and a radius of 5.32 X 10^6 m. The work is determined using the work-energy principle, where the change in total energy (ΔE) is equal to the work done. The correct formula for calculating the work involves the gravitational potential energy function, U(r) = -GMm/r, and the total energy change between the two orbits is essential for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy, specifically U(r) = -GMm/r
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle in physics
  • Knowledge of circular orbital mechanics
  • Ability to perform integration in the context of physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy and its applications in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about the work-energy principle and its implications in various physical systems
  • Explore the concept of kinetic energy in circular orbits and its relationship with potential energy
  • Practice problems involving the integration of forces to find work done in gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and orbital dynamics, as well as educators looking for examples of the work-energy principle in action.

lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the work required to move a planet's satellite of mass 2230 kg from a circular orbit of radius 2R to one of radius 3R, where 5.32 X 10^6 m is the radius of the planet. The mass of the planet is 3.36 X 10^24 kg.

Answer in units of J.

Homework Equations



U(r) = -\frac{G M m}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



W = \Delta U = U_f - Ui = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{3 R} + \frac{G M_p M_s}{2 R} = - \frac{2 G M_p M_s}{6 R} + \frac{3 G M_p M_s}{6 R} = \frac{G M_p M_s}{6 R}

the answer I got (1.5663 X 10^10) was wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to integrate dU(r) from 2R to 3R; R varies as the work is done.
 
i came up with the same answer via integration
 
There will also be a difference in kinetic energy, that is you need to park it in the orbit. Just getting it there is not enough.
 
Last edited:
I just used

\Delta E = E_f - E_i = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{2}(\frac{1}{R_f} - \frac{1}{R_i})

and that was the right answer; so the change in total energy is equal to work?
 
lizzyb said:
I just used

\Delta E = E_f - E_i = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{2}(\frac{1}{R_f} - \frac{1}{R_i})

and that was the right answer; so the change in total energy is equal to work?

Yes. That is the work-energy principal. The expression you used for the total energy reflects the changes in both potential and kinetic energies between the two orbits. The total energy change is equal to the work done to change the orbit.
 
How is this equation derived?
 
andrevdh said:
How is this equation derived?

For a circular orbit

F = mv²/r = GMm/r²

mv² = GMm/r

E = KE + PE = ½mv² - GMm/r = ½GMm/r - GMm/r = -½GMm/r
 
Thank you. I thought it would be complicated - integration ...?
 
  • #10
andrevdh said:
Thank you. I thought it would be complicated - integration ...?

The potential energy function comes from integrating the gravitational force, but that's been done many times so we use the result: PE = -GMm/r
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K