Work to move a planet's satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizzyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move a satellite from a circular orbit of radius 2R to 3R around a planet. The initial approach using the potential energy formula yielded an incorrect result, prompting the need for integration to account for the varying radius during the work done. The correct method involves calculating the change in total energy, which includes both potential and kinetic energy, confirming that the work done equals this energy change. The participants clarify that the potential energy function is derived from integrating gravitational force, simplifying the process. Overall, the work-energy principle is emphasized as crucial for understanding orbital mechanics.
lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the work required to move a planet's satellite of mass 2230 kg from a circular orbit of radius 2R to one of radius 3R, where 5.32 X 10^6 m is the radius of the planet. The mass of the planet is 3.36 X 10^24 kg.

Answer in units of J.

Homework Equations



U(r) = -\frac{G M m}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



W = \Delta U = U_f - Ui = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{3 R} + \frac{G M_p M_s}{2 R} = - \frac{2 G M_p M_s}{6 R} + \frac{3 G M_p M_s}{6 R} = \frac{G M_p M_s}{6 R}

the answer I got (1.5663 X 10^10) was wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'd have to integrate dU(r) from 2R to 3R; R varies as the work is done.
 
i came up with the same answer via integration
 
There will also be a difference in kinetic energy, that is you need to park it in the orbit. Just getting it there is not enough.
 
Last edited:
I just used

\Delta E = E_f - E_i = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{2}(\frac{1}{R_f} - \frac{1}{R_i})

and that was the right answer; so the change in total energy is equal to work?
 
lizzyb said:
I just used

\Delta E = E_f - E_i = - \frac{G M_p M_s}{2}(\frac{1}{R_f} - \frac{1}{R_i})

and that was the right answer; so the change in total energy is equal to work?

Yes. That is the work-energy principal. The expression you used for the total energy reflects the changes in both potential and kinetic energies between the two orbits. The total energy change is equal to the work done to change the orbit.
 
How is this equation derived?
 
andrevdh said:
How is this equation derived?

For a circular orbit

F = mv²/r = GMm/r²

mv² = GMm/r

E = KE + PE = ½mv² - GMm/r = ½GMm/r - GMm/r = -½GMm/r
 
Thank you. I thought it would be complicated - integration ...?
 
  • #10
andrevdh said:
Thank you. I thought it would be complicated - integration ...?

The potential energy function comes from integrating the gravitational force, but that's been done many times so we use the result: PE = -GMm/r
 
Back
Top