Would a theory with ONLY logarithmic divergencies be renormalizable ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic Theory
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
the idea is let us supppose we have a well behaved theory where only logarithmic divergences of the form

\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x+a}=I(a) for several values of 'a' occur ,

then would this theory be renormalizable ?? , i think QED works because only logarithmic divergencies appear , in fact the integral above I(a) can be regularized in the sense of Hadamard (or either differentiating respect to 'a' ) in the form

I(a)= -log(a)+c_a here c_a is a free parameter to be fixed by experiments... Hadamard finite part integral says that


\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x+a}=I(a)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \frac{H(x-a)}{x}

so in the sense of distribution theory the integral I(a) exits and is equal to log(a)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but not because of the nature of the divergence. Renormalisability refers to whether it's possible to absorb the divergences into some redefinitions of constants. If this can be done with a finite number of constants (which would then be determined by experiment), then it's called renormalisable.

The log divergence just means that we can be happy about the accuracy of the theory, since it means that the difference between the bare value and the measured value is fairly small. (Remember that usually, the bare value is not the value at infinity energy, but something large, like Plank scale.) This produces confidence in the convergence rate of perturbation expansions.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top