Would lots of sounds tend to cancel out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Freespader
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Sound waves consist of high and low pressure variations, and when many identical sounds are produced out of phase, they can cancel each other out. However, when some waves are in phase, they reinforce one another, leading to an overall increase in volume. The addition of sound waves does not result in a simple doubling of volume, as it follows a different mathematical relationship. While it may seem intuitive that more sounds would always lead to greater loudness, the reality is more complex, involving both constructive and destructive interference. Understanding these principles requires a scientific approach rather than relying on intuition or emotions.
Freespader
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
My understanding of sound waves is that they are waves of high and low pressure. So if there were a lot of identical sounds, but randomly out of phase, would they tend to cancel each other out, producing no sound at all? Assuming thousands or even millions of sources of these sounds. To me, it seems more intuitive that the more sounds you have the louder it would get, but I also feel like that couldn't happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If two different noise signals of equal power are added together, the volume doesn't double, as DC voltages would, but goes up by the square root of two. So yes there is a certain amount of canceling out, but the overall trend is louder.
 
Freespader, Yes, sound waves in fluids like air, for example, are periodic pressure variations. If there are "a lot of identical sounds but (some of them) randomly out of phase" those will cancel out. At the same time there will be other waves in phase and so they would reinforce one another to make the result louder. You are correct: generally speaking, the more sounds present the louder it would be.

We cannot learn how natural mechanisms function intuitively, nor can we understand nature by how we feel about its processes. Sometimes we see experiments that demonstrate counter-intuitive results. Emotions have no place in physics. We have to use the scientific method if we are to arrive at correct understandings.
 
In addition: think about light of different wavelenghts, phases, intensities and directions of propagation. If all wavelenghts have the same probability to be present, the result is white light. In acoustic is called white noise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_noise
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top