Would modeling collisions using Coulomb forces be useful?

AI Thread Summary
Modeling collisions using Coulomb forces to account for the mutual repulsion of valence electrons presents a unique approach that diverges from traditional conservation laws. The feasibility of this method hinges on the complexity of accurately simulating a vast number of electrons, with suggestions to use a continuous charge distribution over irregular surfaces. The potential usefulness of this modeling technique is uncertain and may vary based on specific applications. While some believe this approach could yield valuable insights, it is noted that similar attempts have been made in the past without clear outcomes. Overall, the decision to pursue this project should consider both the challenges and potential benefits of such a modeling strategy.
pantheid
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to decide on a topic for my senior project, and my professor and I fleetingly discussed my idea of writing a program that models collisions of macroscopic objects using the mutual repulsive forces of their valence electrons rather than standard conservation laws. My question is, is this a worthwhile pursuit? Would trying to analyze collisions in this way make it more complicated, or might this be more useful than using conservation laws in some scenarios?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think you will learn from this?

How do you plan on modeling 10^23 electrons?
 
I was intending to use a continuous distribution of charge over a weirdly shaped surface, rather than just individual charges.
 
You are thinking of modelling the valence electrons as some sort of restricted-motion fluid over the surface of the object with a fixed distribution of positive charge under it?

It would depend on the application ... there is no way to tell in advance if it will be useful.
I have a feeling it is the sort of thing people try every now and again.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Understanding dissipation of energy in a resistor through the Drude model
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Modeling Coulomb Friction for a Moving Point Mass in a Circular Bowl
Replies
20
Views
1K
I Separation energy of nucleons and Coulomb barrier
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Understanding Physics for Coding Collision of 2 Balls
Replies
14
Views
3K
How Do You Model a Collision and Determine G-Force?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Coulomb's force in atoms and effect on dipoles
Replies
1
Views
2K
What are the derivations, uses, and limitations of the extended Coulomb's Law?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Maxwell's equations VS. Lorentz & Coulomb force equations
2
Replies
65
Views
18K
Point charge with very thin metal sheet along a spherical surface
Replies
21
Views
2K
B Tidal effect in the balance of Coulomb and nuclear forces?
Replies
8
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top