The discussion centers on the dilemma of whether to continue walking on a high cliff during a thunderstorm or to seek shelter. Participants express varying views on trusting nature versus taking precautions. One perspective suggests that lightning is more likely to strike high ground, advocating for finding lower ground instead of hiding. Another viewpoint emphasizes the importance of seeking shelter, arguing that staying behind a bush can significantly reduce the risk of being struck by lightning. The conversation also questions the rationale of being on a cliff during such dangerous weather conditions, highlighting the inherent risks involved. Overall, the dialogue reflects a mix of trust in nature and caution in the face of natural dangers.
#1
tabloid
50
0
if u were walkin on a high cliff full of thunderous thunderstorms/lightning,would u take a chance and walk on;or would u try to hide your silly self?
Hey all. Looks like my 15 year anniversary of joining PF happened yesterday (while my internet was down). Just wanted to say thanks to everyone, staff and non-staff, for helping make PF such a wonderful community over the years. Here's to everyone at PF, current, past, or future. Cheers!
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here.
Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it:
Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources)
Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources)
Christoph...