WriterMaximization of Differentiable Real-Valued Function with Linear Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter NaturePaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximization
NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Suppose f =f(x_1, x_2,...,x_n) be a real-valued, any-time differentiable function. Let each x_i=x_i(u_1, u_2,...,u_{2^n-1}) be a linear function of reall u_i's. Let f=g(u_1, u_2,...,u_{2^n-1}). Then is it right that Max f w.r.t. x_i=Max of g w.r.t. u_i?

Sorry for the inconvenience of typo. I don't know how to use LateX fonts here.

Regards,
NaturePaper
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If a f has a maximum, then that maximum is a specific number. That number is larger than all other values of f no matter what variables you are using. Thus, the answer is "yes". The maximum value of f is independent of the variables.
 
@HallsofIvy,

Does the result will change if all the primary variables x_i's are restricted to have values from an interval [a,b] subset of R?

Thanks & regards,
NaturePaper
 
If you also restrict the "u" variables so that the range is the set of permissible x variables, no the result does not change. Of course, if you allow values of the u variables that would give unallowed x values, then maxima might well be different.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top