X and x' in two coordinate relativistic systems

C_Ovidiu
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
let's say we have two coordinate systems ( S-OXYZ and S'-O'X'Y'Z') , S' moving with velocity v away from S . At t=0 O=O'.

According to Lorentz' transformations we have :

At t=0 x in as a function of x' :
x=\frac{x'}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}=x'\gamma

Now, say I know x(I just found it above) , and I want to find x'
x'=x\gamma=x'\gamma^2=>\gamma^2=1

Where does this come from and what have I missed ?
Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C_Ovidiu said:
let's say we have two coordinate systems ( S-OXYZ and S'-O'X'Y'Z') , S' moving with velocity v away from S . At t=0 O=O'.

According to Lorentz' transformations we have :

At t=0 x in as a function of x' :
x=\frac{x'}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}=x'\gamma
Why are you just looking at cases where t=0? The general transformation would be x' = \gamma (x - vt), so if t=0 then you do have x' = \gamma x (you seem to have reversed x and x' though, unless you meant to write t'=0).
C_Ovidiu said:
Now, say I know x(I just found it above) , and I want to find x'
x'=x\gamma=x'\gamma^2=>\gamma^2=1
I agree with x' = x \gamma in the case of t=0, but where are you getting x \gamma = x' \gamma^2? Are you taking the reverse Lorentz transform x = \gamma (x' + vt') and setting t'=0 as well, thus getting x = \gamma x'? The problem is that if you set both t=0 and t'=0, the only coordinates where both time coordinates are 0 are (x=0, t=0) and (x'=0, t'=0), so obviously if x'=0 then you can have x' = x' \gamma^2 even when \gamma is not 0.
 
Last edited:
Tnx.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top