X is a random variable so is |X|?

BoogieE
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Howdy guys. Given that X is a random variable how would you prove |X| to be one too? Thanks for any suggestions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of random variable?
 
Just mapping from (S,F) to (R, B(R))
 
X is measurable, | | is continuous hence measurable. And the composition of measurables is measurable.
 
I am expecting that from the fact that X(-1)(G) = {w in S such that X(w) is in G for all G in B(R) } is in F you can somehow show that |X|(-1)(G') = {w in S such that |X|(w) is in G' for all G' in B(R)} is also if F
 
micromass said:
X is measurable, | | is continuous hence measurable. And the composition of measurables is measurable.
I asked my math professor and she said this is ok. I probably overthought the problem. Thank you very much!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top