Why does silver have lower absorption than zirconium at 35 keV?

Myrddin
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
so just about finishing a report on x ray abosprtion on different materials, generally the linear attneuation coefficent increases with atominc number Z. However silver(47) had a lower attenuation coefficent then zirconium(40) despite having the significantly higher value of Z.

With some reading found that the absorption edges ;where there is a rapid increase in absorption from photon matching the binding of a shell, depends on the energy of the x ray your using. So we thought this must explain our result with silver. Looking at the K shell :

Zirconium has Kedge absortpion at 18KeV
Silver has kedge absorption 25 KeV

Our supply voltage was 35Kv---> 35KeV , so why does zircmonium have more absortion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer lies in the fact that (K) edges of zirconium and silver have different shapes. The K edge of silver has a very sharp rise at 25 keV, but then a gradual decrease as energy increases. So even though the absorption was lower for silver than for zirconium at 25 keV, it still had more absorption at 35 keV due to its gradual decrease in absorption. Thus, the higher atomic number of silver did not necessarily lead to it having a higher linear attenuation coefficient than zirconium.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top