X-Ray Production in Beiser's Physics Textbook: Typo or Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    X-ray
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a formula for x-ray production in Arthur Beiser's modern physics textbook, which raises questions about the units involved. Participants clarify that "namdamin" refers to the minimum wavelength of x-rays, denoted as "lambda," and that "V" represents voltage. The formula presented is correct, as it shows that the units of volts cancel out, resulting in meters, which is appropriate for wavelength. The confusion stems from the distinction between voltage as a variable and volts as a unit. Ultimately, the formula accurately describes the relationship between energy and wavelength in x-ray production.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
in my modern physics textbook 6/E by arthur beiser,
the formula for x-ray production is written as
(namdamin)=1.24*10^(-6)/V V*m
is that a typo? how can namda have units of V*m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it would help if you explained exactly what you are talking about!

As far as I know "x-ray production" doesn't have units! What exactly does
"nambdamin" mean? (Was that supposed to be "lambda"?) Oh, and what is V? volts?
 
x-ray production doesn't have units?
jeepers~
i must be misunderstanding modern physics...
:P
i don't know how to type the symbols, but yes, "nambda min" means the "lambda" minimun...
V stands for volts...
 
the second V (that's multiplied by meters) is a UNIT, Volts.
But the first V (that you divide by) is a VARIABLE ... Voltage.

These are NOT the same thing, but the units cancel.

"the lamda minimum ..."
lamda of WHAT? V of WHAT?
 
asdf1 said:
in my modern physics textbook 6/E by arthur beiser,
the formula for x-ray production is written as
(namdamin)=1.24*10^(-6)/V V*m
is that a typo? how can namda have units of V*m?
You are talking about the minimum wavength of x-rays produced by accelerating electrons through a voltage V and slamming them against a target. Naturally, the maximum energy of an x-ray will be the final KE of the electron before it hits the target.

That gives

KE(electron) = e*V = \frac{hc}{\lambda_{min}}
\implies~ \lambda_{min} = \frac{hc}{eV} = \frac {hc}{e} \cdot \frac{1}{V}

The quantity hc/e has a value of 1.24 *10^{-6}~Vm

When you divide by the units of the applied voltage V (ie: volts), you are left with units of meters, the correct unit for a wavelength !
 
Last edited:
thank you very much! :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top