XRD FWHM, debye-scherrer's formula & AFM surface morphology

jcli0002
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I have an question about the correlation between grain size caculated from debye-scherrer and the AFM results for my AlN epi layer samples.

From my AFM results, the trend of grain size of three samples are getting smaller( around 200-10 nm range among three samples). but the FWHM of XRD from the samples are 0.24,0.22,
0.21 degree. according to the scherrer's formula, the grain size should increase and get bigger.
it seems it contradict the AFM results.

I am wondering whether it is proper correlation between AFM results and the calculation from scherrer's formula.

THanks

J.C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
I want to know, in scherre equation, the FWHM should be in gradian or degree?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
18K
Back
Top