Y: Calculating Expectation Value of O with Orthonormal State

  • Thread starter Thread starter qtp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
qtp
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a question... if anyone can maybe help :confused:

you have psi = a(psi1) + b(psi2) + c(psi3) and the state is orthonormal...
what is the expectation value of O if O (O is an operator) yields known eigenvalues for psi1 psi2 and psi3 i tried to say that psi1*Opsi1 over all space is (a)(eigenvalue of psi1) times integral of psi1*psi1 which is 1 since the state is orthonormal but that didn't give me the right answer. The correct answer is 1 with a= 1/(root(6)) b= 1/(root(2)) c= 1/(root(3)) and Opsi1 = 1psi1, Opsi2 = -1psi2, Opsi3 = 2psi3 any help would be greatly appreciated :biggrin:

qtP
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
qtp said:
The correct answer is 1
I get 1/3 as follows:

<O> = <\psi|O|\psi>
= <a\psi_1 + b\psi_2 + c\psi_3|O|a\psi_1 + b\psi_2 + c\psi_3>
= <a\psi_1 + b\psi_2 + c\psi_3|a\psi_1 - b\psi_2 + 2c\psi_3>
= a^2 - b^2 + 2c^2
= \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{2}{3}
= \frac{1}{3}
 
Last edited:
hey thank you very much :) you are correct but the answer is 1 because i switched Opsi1 and Opsi2 Opsi1= -1psi1 and Opsi2= 1psi2 so it is -1/6+ 1/2+ 2/3 = 1 thank you again :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top