Y Gene Domination: Male Progeny or Female Progeny?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicist007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gene
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the genetic mechanisms determining sex in various organisms, highlighting that a heterozygous XY genotype results in male progeny, while a homozygous XX genotype leads to female progeny. The conversation clarifies that Y chromosomes are not genes but rather large DNA structures that carry multiple genes. It emphasizes that sex determination involves activating specific genetic switches influenced by environmental conditions or genetic controls. The distinction between homogametic (XX) and heterogametic (XY) sexes is noted, along with examples from other species, such as birds and zebrafish, where sex-determining systems can evolve and change. The concept of dominance in genetics is also addressed, questioning the applicability of dominance to the Y chromosome, given that dominance typically requires a pair of different alleles, which does not apply to the XY configuration.
physicist007
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
When the genotype of zygote is heterozygous XY then it results into a male progeny while to obtain a female progeny homozygous XX conditions are needed. Although homozygous YY condition is not possible in nature, but can we say that Y gene seems dominant??
 
Biology news on Phys.org
physicist007 said:
When the genotype of zygote is heterozygous XY then it results into a male progeny while to obtain a female progeny homozygous XX conditions are needed. Although homozygous YY condition is not possible in nature, but can we say that Y gene seems dominant??
Those are chromosomes, not genes, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Sex determining systems in animals work by flipping particular genetic switches (activating genes usually) which result in a cascade of events leading to the differentiation of an individual into one gene or another. The molecular genetics of many of these have been worked out in great detail.
The initial flipping of the "master" switch can result from:
particular environmental conditions (like temperature in alligators),
experimental manipulations,
or the counts of numbers of particular genes (genetic control).

Genetic controls like this can make use of particular genes on non-sex chromosomes, or on sex chromosomes (chromosomes that appear different from each other). Chromosomes are very large pieces of DNA which (often) carry many genes on them.
Sex chromosome systems have a homogametic and a heterogametic sex. The homogametic sex has two copies of the same kind of chromosome (like the XX in mammalian females), The heterogametic sex is the one with two different sex chromosomes (like XY in mammalian males). It can be the other way around, like in birds but the chromosomes are named Z and W and the female is ZW while the male is ZZ (maybe the Brits would say "double Zed").

Surprisingly, which chromosome is determinative can change in evolution. Recently, it has been demonstrated that genetic lines of zebrafish (AB and Tübingen) picked up and fixed (only genes in the breeding population) significant sex determining genes mutations (probably when they were first generated from a small number of animals). Nevertheless, they still were able to make males and females, but not in predictable ratios.

Platies and swordfish (of the genus Xiphophorus) have changed their sex chromosomes during their complicated evolution (lots of crossing between different species).

There can also be weird and unusual (but natural) chromosome situations like YY or XXX. But they are not common.
 
physicist007 said:
Although homozygous YY condition is not possible in nature, but can we say that Y gene seems dominant??

To be dominant, don't you need a pair of chromosomes with different alleles for the same gene? That wouldn't apply to the XY chromosome pair since they don't have the same genes.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top