Y-intercept of a lambda square VS tension of standing wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment involving standing waves created by a string attached to a hanging mass and a string vibrator. The slope of the resulting graph is identified as 1/(u*f^2), where u is linear density and f is frequency. Participants debate the significance of the Y-intercept, with one suggesting it represents air friction, noting that a vacuum would eliminate the Y-intercept. There is also a request for a visual representation of the graph to enhance understanding. Overall, the conversation explores the theoretical and practical implications of the Y-intercept in the context of the experiment.
Simon George
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all!

I am doing an experiment where we create a standing wave by attaching a string to a hanging mass at one end and to a string vibrator at the other (the string passes through a pulley). When plotting the graph, the slope is inevitably 1/(u*f^2) where u is the linear density and f the frequency.

In this context, what would be the Y-intercept of the graph. Theoretically, there shouldn't be any, I know, but what does it represents in the reality of this experiment?

My guess is that it represents the friction by the air. There wouldn't be any y-intercept if this experiment was to be done in vaccum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sounds like a good question. Can you post a copy of the graph? You can use the UPLOAD button down there next to POST REPLY and PREVIEW to take a JPG or BMP or PNG file from your computer and put it in a post.
 
anorlunda said:
That sounds like a good question. Can you post a copy of the graph? You can use the UPLOAD button down there next to POST REPLY and PREVIEW to take a JPG or BMP or PNG file from your computer and put it in a post.
 

Attachments

  • graph.png
    graph.png
    25.1 KB · Views: 774
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top