Stargazing Yet another Wall Street Journal article about space debris

AI Thread Summary
The Wall Street Journal has published multiple articles on space debris over the years, highlighting the increasing threat posed by dead satellites and other debris to operational spacecraft like the Hubble Space Telescope. Their latest front-page article discusses the dangers of a growing mass of space junk that could impact critical equipment used for communication and national security. The discussion raises questions about any recent developments in addressing this ongoing issue, prompting a request for subscribers to summarize the article's key points. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of space debris for astronomy and the potential for debris to create visual phenomena if it enters the atmosphere. Overall, the topic underscores the urgent need for solutions to mitigate space debris risks.
UsableThought
Messages
381
Reaction score
250
The Wall Street Journal is definitely interested in space debris - dead satellites, boosters, etc. - as they've run a number of stories on this topic over the past few years. E.g. Wikipedia has a link to a story from 2009 as one of the footnotes to their article on space debris, plus a web search turns up a couple of articles in the Journal from 2011 - "Fighting Space Junk: The Next Generation" in August and "Can the Pentagon Save Earth from Space Junk" in May of that year.

The Journal's latest is a front page article this morning, "There’s a Speeding Mass of Space Junk Orbiting Earth, Smashing Into Things." Subtitle is, "A growing band of debris and tiny satellites imperils the Hubble Space Telescope and equipment used for phones, national security and weather forecasting." Like all their articles it's behind a pay wall; so I am curious, if anyone here subscribes to the Journal, could you read the article & post a brief summary? No need to quote at length, I am just wondering what the impetus is for a new article - has there been a new development in this ongoing problem and if so what? Thanks.

P.S. Mods, if you feel this thread is in the wrong forum, feel free to move. I am required to add a prefix to the title which seems a bit odd - this is not a B, I, or A thread. It does relate to astronomy & stargazing given that we wouldn't want space junk to take out the Hubble. Or anything else - I was just reading in a book I have on stargazing (Night Sky with the Naked Eye) & saw some photos of astronauts relaxing inside the ISS - I wouldn't want space junk to hit that either.

13f36bfe89d6e59f63c718cbcc5e7ce1--dyson-self-portraits.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Interesting topic! I will follow up + perhaps come back after doing some reading.
UsableThought said:
It does relate to astronomy & stargazing given that we wouldn't want space junk to take out the Hubble. Or anything else - I was just reading in a book I have on stargazing (Night Sky with the Naked Eye) & saw some photos of astronauts relaxing inside the ISS - I wouldn't want space junk to hit that either.
Definitely [stargazing ...], I agree. Also potentially these things could provide "spectacles" or "undesired visitors" if diverted into our atmosphere (kind of artificial meteors or meteorites [the largest ones even hitting the ground] ...) ...
 
  • Like
Likes UsableThought

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Thread 'Could fast radio bursts be alien radar signals?'

Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
View full post »

Similar threads

Question about space junk in orbit
Replies
13
Views
3K
Kerbal Space Program - Rocket Design Basics
Replies
2
Views
9K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 261)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 266)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 257)
Replies
5
Views
4K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
Replies
7
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 236)
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top