Young's Double Slit experiment

raknath
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I have a doubt on this

The experiment per se does not say anything wrt to the size of the slit right?

Now my question here is, if i actually reduce the size of the slit to such a size that only one atom of a particular gas(say helium) can pass through this

Now let us say i bombard the slits with helium and then shine light(laser if you like, of different phases) on it then, would the interference pattern still be observed, or will the light get blocked out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raknath said:
Hi all

I have a doubt on this

The experiment per se does not say anything wrt to the size of the slit right?

Now my question here is, if i actually reduce the size of the slit to such a size that only one atom of a particular gas(say helium) can pass through this

Now let us say i bombard the slits with helium and then shine light(laser if you like, of different phases) on it then, would the interference pattern still be observed, or will the light get blocked out?

There are issues about slit size and spacing. For there to be interference, there must be multiple paths without cancellation. There are a number of related issues.

Assuming that: if you shine light incident such that the path taken can be determined, then the interference disappears.
 
DrChinese said:
There are issues about slit size and spacing. For there to be interference, there must be multiple paths without cancellation. There are a number of related issues.
Like?

DrChinese just wanted to know, why is size never taken into account for this experiment, is it because it has never been repeated with other particles like electrons and with varying slit sizes. Seems a pity that such a nice experiment does not have enough data

DrChinese said:
Assuming that: if you shine light incident such that the path taken can be determined, then the interference disappears.

Why would the interference disappear if i shine laser beams, phase shifted wrt each other?
 
raknath said:
Like?

DrChinese just wanted to know, why is size never taken into account for this experiment, is it because it has never been repeated with other particles like electrons and with varying slit sizes. Seems a pity that such a nice experiment does not have enough data



Why would the interference disappear if i shine laser beams, phase shifted wrt each other?

1. Interference has actually been demonstrated with all kinds of subatomic particles, including molecular nuclei (such as fullerene). So size been investigated. In fact, there is a web page that shows what happens when size parameters are varied, although I don't have the link in front of me.

2. Any mechanism that allows the "which slit" information to be learned will cause the interference to disappear.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top