zhermes
- 1,253
- 3
Is there any reason to expect both the star formation history and the angular diameter distance to peak at around the same value (redshift ~ 1.6)?
The discussion centers on the correlation between star formation history and angular diameter distance peaking at redshift ~ 1.6. It concludes that any observed coincidence is purely coincidental. Star formation is influenced by the physics of structure formation, reaching its peak at a specific epoch in the universe's timeline. In contrast, angular diameter distance varies based on the observer's time, indicating no inherent relationship between the two phenomena.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, cosmologists, and astrophysicists interested in the dynamics of star formation and the implications of angular diameter distance in observational studies.
Only by pure coincidence. Star formation depends upon the physics of the formation of structure, and peaks at a specific time after the start of our universe. Angular diameter distance peaks at different times depending upon the time of the observer.zhermes said:Is there any reason to expect both the star formation history and the angular diameter distance to peak at around the same value (redshift ~ 1.6)?