Z/A in the Chandrasekhar formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Chandrasekhar formula, which determines the maximum mass a white dwarf can have before collapsing under gravity, supported by electron degeneracy pressure. The term (Z/A)² in the formula represents the ratio of electrons to atomic weight, indicating how electron-rich an atom is and its ability to resist collapse. The formula is expressed as 0.20 (Z/A)² (hc/Gmprot²)³/2, relating mass to the proton mass. In natural units, it simplifies to pi (Z/A)² Λprot², with Λprot being the Compton wavelength of the proton. The discussion highlights the significance of this formula in understanding stellar remnants and their stability.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
A white dwarf---a cooling remnant of a star, no longer fusing---is protected from collapse by the pauli exclusion principle which says that no two electrons can occupy the same state (position and momentum). So crowding electrons together forces them to compensate by having high momenta and a pressure arises called "electron degeneracy pressure" which would exist even if the temperature were zero.

Chandrasekhar discovered a formula for the largest mass which can support itself against gravitational collapse by the pressure of its electrons.

this formula has a term (Z/A)2

how to understand it? well for a given atom Z is the number of electrons! and A is the atomic weight. So Z/A gives a good idea of
how electron-rich it is and how well it will resist collapse. In effect it is an "electrons per weight" number, giving a notion of "pressure per weight" as well.

That's all I have to say about it for now. I tried to understand the formula better today. If anyone has some insight or wants to try to explain it go ahead. Its interesting. The formula is:


0.20 (Z/A)2 (hc/Gmprot2)3/2

which is a pure number expressing the mass as a multiple of the proton mass mprot

In other words, if you want a complete expression for the mass you multiply the number times mprot and get

0.20 (Z/A)2 (hc/Gmprot2)3/2 mprot

That's verbatim from Frank Shu, I use a version rewritten using hbar in place of h.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is an important length called the (angular format) Compton wavelength of the proton

Λprot

and in natural units (c=G=hbar=1) it is simply the
reciprocal of the mass.

the mass of the proton happens to be 1/13E18 and so

Λprot = 13E18

In natural units the Chandrasekhar limit is expressed not in proton masses but in Planck masses and the previous formula
essentially simplifies to

pi (Z/A)2 Λprot2

it gives 1.3E38 for the case Z/A=1/2

If you prefer replace the lamba by the reciprocal of the proton mass, it doesn't make any numerical difference

pi (Z/A)2 (13E18)2

One solar mass is 0.93E38 in natural units, so if you like to express things in solar masses you can work out what 1.3E38 is.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top