Zeeman Effect - average shift is zero?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2zgd7hw.png


Part (a):Find the first order shift in energy
Part(b): What is the degeneracy after perturbation? Find Show average shift in energy is zero.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've shown part (a), the troubling part is part (b).

Part (b)
With the perturbation, the degeneracy is lifted. Hence degeneracy = 0.

For ##j=l+\frac{1}{2}##, shift is ##\Delta E_+ = \frac{1}{4}mc^2 \alpha^4\frac{(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+\frac{3}{2}) - l(l+1) - \frac{3}{4}}{n^3 l(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+1)}##

For ##j=l-\frac{1}{2}##, shift is ##\Delta E_- = \frac{1}{4}mc^2 \alpha^4\frac{(l-\frac{1}{2})(l+\frac{1}{2}) - l(l+1) - \frac{3}{4}}{n^3 l(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+1)}##.

The total perturbation is given by the sum of positive perturbation and negative perturbation:

[tex]\delta E= \Delta E_+ + \Delta E_-[/tex]
[tex]\delta E = \frac{mc^2 \alpha^4}{2n^3 l}[/tex]

Clearly, the average perturbation for a given n and l is not zero. How does it even become zero then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j = l + 1/2 and j = l - 1/2 have different degeneracies. They contribute different weights to the average.
 
Last edited:
dauto said:
j = l + 1/2 and j = i - 1/2 have different degeneracies. They contribute different weights to the average.

Each has a weight of ##2l-1##?
 
unscientific said:
Each has a weight of ##2l-1##?

No, they have weights 2j+1 for two different values of j
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
dauto said:
No, they have weights 2j+1 for two different values of j

Oh yeah, because when two angular momenta ##j_1## and ##j_2## are combined, each state in ##J = j_1 + j_2## ranges from -J to +J in steps of 1.

I keep forgetting that this is a two-angular momentum problem, not a simple one with only spin.

[tex]\delta E = (2j_+ +1)\Delta E_+ + (2j_- +1)\Delta E_-[/tex]

I worked it out, and it appears to be zero.
 
Last edited: