Does the magnetic field decrease in a Zeeman slower as atoms slow down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter throneoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Zeeman
throneoo
Messages
125
Reaction score
2
Background: I have limited knowledge on QM and only know that magnetic fields split the energy levels of an atom

It seems counter-intuitive to me that as the atoms slow down along the tube the magnetic field strength decreases
http://es1.ph.man.ac.uk/AJM2/Atomtrapping/Zeeman-B-field.jpg

as far as I understand, the point is to increase the field so the less blue-shifted photons can fit into the energy gap between the excited and ground state , which is decreased by amplifying the effects of the splitting

Apparently it isn't the case, as shown by the figure. So where am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
throneoo said:
blue-shifted photons
The laser is red-shifted from the atomic transition (including the magnetic field). The Doppler effect brings it closer to resonance, where scattering is strong. But as it slows down, the atom sees the laser light as being more and more red-detuned. Decreasing the magnetic field lowers the energy of the transition, such that the laser is again close to resonance.
 
DrClaude said:
The laser is red-shifted from the atomic transition (including the magnetic field). The Doppler effect brings it closer to resonance, where scattering is strong. But as it slows down, the atom sees the laser light as being more and more red-detuned. Decreasing the magnetic field lowers the energy of the transition, such that the laser is again close to resonance.
My confusion is actually about is the field's effect on the energy levels. Surely if they split, the energy gap between the highest ground state and the lowest excited state will decrease and that gap is wider with a weaker magnetic field? So I don't see how that helps the transition.

After doing some reading, I think the selection rule has something to do with this, as it negates my assumption that the electron can jump between any two states.
 
You want the cooling transition to be a closed one, so yes, selection rules play a role. But what is more important for your question is what is the behavior of the two levels used for cooling with respect to a magnetic field. Experimenters use a decreasing magnetic field because the chosen excited state gets shifted more than the ground state, and hence the separation in energy grows with the magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes throneoo
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top