Zero as a Multiple: Understanding the Concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcflores
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Zero
AI Thread Summary
Zero is indeed considered a multiple of any integer, including 5, because it can be expressed as 0 multiplied by that integer. The definition states that an integer a is a multiple of an integer b if there exists an integer c such that a = b * c. Therefore, since 0 = 5 * 0, zero qualifies as a multiple of 5. Conversely, the only multiple of zero is zero itself, as no other integer can satisfy the multiplication condition. This distinction clarifies the concept of multiples in relation to zero.
marcflores
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Zero a multiple of 5?

My wife, who is great at math and did well for herself at Harvey Mudd, missed a question on a practice GMAT. At the answer section it said, "Remember, zero is also a multiple of 5."

Is this correct? Zero, I thought, was not a multiple of anything!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If we use the definition that an integer a is a multiple of an integer b if there is an integer c such that a=b*c, then zero is a multiple of 5 because 0=0*5. In fact, zero is a multiple of any integer.

On the other hand, the only thing that is a multiple of zero is zero itself.
 
That is true. Thanks for clarifying that.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top