Zero Electric Field on the x-Axis Due to Opposing Charges at Different Positions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kimberlyann9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the regions along the x-axis where the electric field is zero due to two opposing charges, q and -Q, located at x = 0 and x = d, respectively. Since -Q has a greater magnitude than q, the electric field will be influenced by both charges. It is suggested that the electric field could potentially be zero in the region x > d, as the forces from both charges need to be analyzed for their direction and magnitude. Participants are encouraged to consider the forces acting on a hypothetical positive charge placed in various regions to identify where the electric field cancels out. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between charge magnitudes and their effects on the electric field.
kimberlyann9
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Charges q and -Q lie on the x-axis at x = 0 and x = d respectively. Charge -Q has a greater magnitude than q. In which region or regions on the x-axis is there a position where the electric field is zero?

A) x < 0
B) x < 0 and x > d
C) 0 < x < d and x > d
D) x > d
E) 0 < x < d


Homework Equations


E=kq/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Not too sure where to start...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kimberlyann9! :smile:
kimberlyann9 said:
Charges q and -Q lie on the x-axis at x = 0 and x = d respectively. Charge -Q has a greater magnitude than q. In which region or regions on the x-axis is there a position where the electric field is zero?

Not too sure where to start...

the electric field is zero if the total force on a charge is zero

we may as well assume the charge is positive

let's start with x > d …

how does the force from q compare with the force from Q, and are they in the same or opposite directions? :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top