Register to reply

Engineering statics calculator

by trajan22
Tags: calculator, engineering, statics
Share this thread:
trajan22
#1
Jun4-07, 06:26 PM
P: 155
My professor today told the class(engineering statics) that we should invest in the ti-89 or an equivelant. He claimed that the ti-83 was good for middle school but not for University work.
However, I was forced to buy a ti-83 because the math department at my school doesnt allow anything higher.
When we studied statics in general physics it never seemed necessary to own a better calculator but Im not sure how much more detailed this course will be.

Would you say it would be necessary to purchase a ti-89 for the class(engineering statics)?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Sapphire talk enlivens guesswork over iPhone 6
Geneticists offer clues to better rice, tomato crops
UConn makes 3-D copies of antique instrument parts
chroot
#2
Jun4-07, 06:29 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
chroot's Avatar
P: 10,429
You should ask him specifically what he expects his students to use the calculator to do. Is he expecting you to compute integrals with the calculator, even if you don't know how to do them by hand? A well-designed class honestly almost never demands the use of a calculator, though sometimes it can speed up boring computations.

- Warren
Cyrus
#3
Jun4-07, 06:30 PM
Cyrus's Avatar
P: 4,780
No, you will never need a Ti-89. What the hell would you need an 89 for in statics?

Moonbear
#4
Jun4-07, 06:35 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,271
Engineering statics calculator

Well, my suggestion would be to know where you can get one quickly if you do find you need it, and then wait to see how the coursework goes. If you find you can get by with what you have, then great, no need to spend more money on another calculator. If it turns out you really DO need a better calculator, then you'll be ready to buy it as soon as you get into the material that requires it. That sucks that they're making you buy two different calculators. When I was in college, none of the engineering majors needed special calculators for their classes...it was more like your math department where they were discouraged in favor of learning how to actually work the problems rather than letting your calculator do all the work for you. You ought to know how to crunch numbers by hand if it really came down to it, but then I'm old-fashioned about things like that. So, I'd just take a wait-and-see approach before shelling out more money for a calculator if you really don't need it (you may find that you can do the problems with the one you have, but not fast enough to get them done on time in an exam, in which case, you will not want to wait until the first exam to determine this).
chroot
#5
Jun4-07, 06:39 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
chroot's Avatar
P: 10,429
I can honestly say that a graphing calculator is a tremendous asset for many kinds of engineering work. Often, just being able to visualize whatever problem you're working on will give you enough intuition to solve it properly.

The higher-end calculators include computer-algebra systems, which can solve equations, compute integrals, etc. The problem is that most of them are pretty primitive, and cannot deal with truly difficult problems. The only integrals they can easily solve are the kind you could easily solve on paper, too. You're better off just using paper most of the time, unless there's just a ton of simple, annoying algebra to wade through.

- Warren
Cyrus
#6
Jun4-07, 06:42 PM
Cyrus's Avatar
P: 4,780
A Ti-83 is a graphing calculator that does linear algebra. The only thing a Ti-89 does is solve integrals. You dont need a Ti-89, period.

If you cant do it on an 83, use a table of integrals and learn to solve it in matlab.
G01
#7
Jun4-07, 06:54 PM
HW Helper
G01's Avatar
P: 2,688
Get a Ti-83, and remember, Maple/Mathmatica are your friends, and one of them should be on your math and physics department's computers.
trajan22
#8
Jun4-07, 07:07 PM
P: 155
Quote Quote by Moonbear View Post
Well, my suggestion would be to know where you can get one quickly if you do find you need it, and then wait to see how the coursework goes. If you find you can get by with what you have, then great, no need to spend more money on another calculator. If it turns out you really DO need a better calculator, then you'll be ready to buy it as soon as you get into the material that requires it. So, I'd just take a wait-and-see approach before shelling out more money for a calculator if you really don't need it (you may find that you can do the problems with the one you have, but not fast enough to get them done on time in an exam, in which case, you will not want to wait until the first exam to determine this).
Thats a good point, I think Ill just wait and see what happens. He said that test problems would be of the same difficulty as the homework, so if the homework requires a better calculator I guess Ill know.

That sucks that they're making you buy two different calculators. When I was in college, none of the engineering majors needed special calculators for their classes...it was more like your math department where they were discouraged in favor of learning how to actually work the problems rather than letting your calculator do all the work for you. You ought to know how to crunch numbers by hand if it really came down to it, but then I'm old-fashioned about things like that.
The funny thing is, is that my school requires a graphing calculator, but you cant use them on tests or quizzes anyway.(at least in all the calculus courses) So its only good for homework problems and exploration. So I guess they still make us actually learn the stuff rather than just punching buttons.
Cyrus
#9
Jun4-07, 07:09 PM
Cyrus's Avatar
P: 4,780
Its statics. You dont need a Ti-89 for statics.

You could do statics on a calculator that has only the most basic functions.
chroot
#10
Jun4-07, 07:11 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
chroot's Avatar
P: 10,429
Quote Quote by cyrusabdollahi View Post
Its statics. You dont need a Ti-89 for statics.
Yeah, I don't really understand what kind of complex integrals arise in statics. It's mostly just plain algebra.

- Warren
trajan22
#11
Jun4-07, 07:21 PM
P: 155
Quote Quote by chroot View Post
Yeah, I don't really understand what kind of complex integrals arise in statics. It's mostly just plain algebra.

- Warren
Thats what I had always thought. Maybe the professor was thinking that it would be easier to solve quadratics since the ti-89 will solve them with alot less effort. But this would'nt merrit spending 100 + dollars to simplify an already simple process. Also, Maybe to make vectors easier to work with but then again that is'nt too difficult either.
mattmns
#12
Jun4-07, 08:13 PM
mattmns's Avatar
P: 1,123
Once I became a math major, I decided to go all out and buy a TI-108: http://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instrume...005950&sr=1-29
Integral
#13
Jun4-07, 08:28 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,315
Quote Quote by mattmns View Post
Once I became a math major, I decided to go all out and buy a TI-108: http://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instrume...005950&sr=1-29
For a math major a calculator is nearly useless.
chroot
#14
Jun4-07, 08:32 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
chroot's Avatar
P: 10,429
Quote Quote by Integral View Post
For a math major a calculator is nearly useless.
Did you click the link?

- Warren
Stevedye56
#15
Jun4-07, 08:41 PM
P: 398
Quote Quote by mattmns View Post
Once I became a math major, I decided to go all out and buy a TI-108: http://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instrume...005950&sr=1-29
That was hilarious. I was expecting some overkill calculator!
Integral
#16
Jun4-07, 08:51 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,315
Quote Quote by chroot View Post
Did you click the link?

- Warren
I guess the answer to that is pretty clear! I have now!
Moonbear
#17
Jun4-07, 09:13 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,271
Quote Quote by mattmns View Post
Once I became a math major, I decided to go all out and buy a TI-108: http://www.amazon.com/Texas-Instrume...005950&sr=1-29
That's about all I've needed to use for most of my career. Needed one with a few trig functions for my undergrad degree, but now I use it to balance my checkbook and make sure I don't make a stupid mistake in simple division when calculating dilutions in the lab while being asked questions by 3 people at once.
BobG
#18
Jun5-07, 08:33 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
BobG's Avatar
P: 2,278
Personally, I've found a good calculator is invaluable for some engineering courses. The Pickett N4ES is particularly good for electrical engineering courses due to the dual base logarithmic scale (a lot of problems require base 10 logs). It also solves quadratic equations very quickly using a visual iterative process.

Pickett N4ES
(Edit: Don't forget to move the parts using your cursor. This really works.)

Of course, it doesn't help all that much in statistics, since it doesn't do sums. Then again, Microsoft Excel can do anything you want to do for statistics and most of what you want to do for any other course (provided you simplify the calculus problems by hand into something you can enter into Excel). Edit: Or, alternatively, you can buy a Picket N525-ES that's specifically designed for statistics.

Pickett N525-ES Stat Rule


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Calculator For Electrical Engineering Calculators 1
Suggest Calculator For Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering 19
Engineering Statics Academic Guidance 0
Engineering Statics Question Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 2
Calculator for Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering 29