Formulating x^n Coordinate System for Non-Rectangular/Spherical Riemann Manifold

In summary, to formulate an x^{n} coordinate system, you can create a parameterized curve with a parameter "s" and use it to define coordinates for a Riemann Manifold that is not rectangular or spherical. This allows you to differentiate with respect to "s" and find the tangent vector to the curve. For a 2d-surface, you can use coordinates "u" and "v".
  • #1
Philosophaie
462
0
I want to be able to formulate [tex]x^{n}[/tex] coordinate system.
[tex]x^{n} =(x^{1}, x^{2}, x^{3}, x^{4}) [/tex]
How do you do this when the Riemann Manifold is not rectangular or spherical?
Also how do you differentiate with respect to "s" in that case.
[tex]\frac{dx^n}{ds}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Philosophaie said:
I want to be able to formulate [tex]x^{n}[/tex] coordinate system.
[tex]x^{n} =(x^{1}, x^{2}, x^{3}, x^{4}) [/tex]
How do you do this when the Riemann Manifold is not rectangular or spherical?
Also how do you differentiate with respect to "s" in that case.
[tex]\frac{dx^n}{ds}[/tex]

you can not simply do ##\frac{dx^n}{ds}##, because you do not have a parameter ##s##.

You should do something like this.
Make up a curve which is parameterized by ##s##.
##s## is your parameter along the curve.

Now you have

##x^{n}(s) = (x^{1}(s), x^{2}(s), x^{3}(s), x^{4}(s))##

And now you can do ##\frac{dx^n}{ds}## just fine.
Which is your tangent vector to the curve (might not be unit length).

Philosophaie said:
How do you do this when the Riemann Manifold is not rectangular or spherical?

Make your own coordinates.
For a 2d-surface you could use ##u## and ##v## as coordinates.

What do you want to do?
 

1. Can you explain the concept of a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold?

A non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold is a mathematical space that is curved, rather than being flat like a Euclidean space. It is used to describe spaces that have intrinsic curvature, such as the surface of a sphere or a non-linear coordinate system.

2. Why is it important to use a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold?

Using a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold allows us to accurately describe and analyze curved spaces, which are often encountered in physics and engineering. It also allows for more efficient calculations and better understanding of the underlying geometry of a space.

3. What is the difference between a rectangular and a non-rectangular Riemann manifold?

A rectangular Riemann manifold has a flat, Euclidean geometry, while a non-rectangular Riemann manifold has a curved geometry. In a rectangular manifold, the distance between two points is the same regardless of the path taken, while in a non-rectangular manifold, the distance may vary depending on the path.

4. How do you formulate a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold using x^n coordinates?

To formulate a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold using x^n coordinates, we start with a set of n coordinates that describe the geometry of the space. These coordinates can be chosen to be non-linear or curved, depending on the desired shape of the manifold. We then use these coordinates to define a metric tensor, which is used to calculate distances and angles in the manifold.

5. What are some practical applications of using a non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifold?

Non-rectangular/spherical Riemann manifolds are used in a variety of fields, including physics, engineering, and computer graphics. They are particularly useful in describing the geometry of curved spacetimes in general relativity, as well as for modeling complex surfaces and shapes in computer graphics and computer-aided design.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
422
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
990
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top