Equivalent Voltage for Thevenin Equivalent Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the equivalent voltage in Thevenin's theorem, specifically the concept of open-circuit voltage, which is defined as the voltage at the output terminals when no current flows. The confusion arises from the relationship between voltage and current, as the participant references Ohm's law (V = IR) and questions how voltage can exist with zero current. They explore the use of voltage dividers to calculate equivalent voltage but struggle with the application of this concept under the assumption of no current. The clarification provided emphasizes that electric potential can exist independently of current flow, illustrated by an isolated battery maintaining a voltage difference. Ultimately, Thevenin voltage represents the potential presented by a source and network when a load is removed.
Kurushimi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't for a class I'm actually taking. Just self study.

I'm reading a book on electronics. When I got to the part about Thevenin's theorem I got a little confused. Specifically, I'm confused about the equivalent voltage for the Thevenin equivalent circuit. It said the equivalent voltage would be the open-circuit voltage, which the book defines as "potential at the output terminals when the output current is zero".

The reason this confuses me is that when I think of the equation V = IR, when you have a 0 current you should have 0 voltage. The book showed an example for calculating the equivalent voltage but they didn't explain how they arrived at their equation, so I figure it's something basic that I'm missing.

The Attempt at a Solution


I went to wikipedia's page on Thevenin's theorem used the concept of a voltage divider to show an example of how to calculate the equivalent voltage. Doing this also yields the equation my book got for its example of calculating equivalent voltage. However, my understanding of a voltage divider relies on the existence of a current through the circuit. Even the proof given the wikipedia page linked uses the assumption of current. So I don't see how it makes sense to apply this concept when calculating equivalent voltage with the assumption that there is no current. How does this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric potential can exist without current flowing. Take for example an isolated 10V battery (no connections). There's still a potential difference of 10V between its terminals even with a load connected. This will be true even if the battery is not ideal and has an internal resistance (no current means no drop across the internal resistance).

The idea with the Thevenin voltage for a given source and network is that you first remove any load and consider the potential that the source and network "presents" to the point where a load was (or will be) connected.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top